Hacker News Reader

TechnoBabble199on To become a better writer, read as much as you can

> The point about LLMs makes even less sense than drawing conclusions from "in mice" studies

Nah I disagree. Humans learn via patterns so do LLMs. They are not human, they don't actually possess intellect - but there are some isomorphisms that can do cleanly translate. I think this one does.

Also, if in mice studies didn't work - we wouldn't use mice for studies - so your example kinda proves my point.

TechnoBabble199on To become a better writer, read as much as you can

In my experience, reading can make you a better writer sure.

But it depends on what you read. Take AI for example, it's trained on a ton of text right? It can write, but can it write effectively? Is its writing really "good" ?

The point I'm trying to make is, there's a difference between reading & learning from the patterns of what you read - and actually learning the best way to write - to actually provide a reader with maximum comprehension (If it's educational) or entertainment (If it's fiction/fantasy)

Best example I can give on this is - you can learn to swim from watching hundreds of people swim - but you won't be an Olympic level swimmer unless you learn from the best.

If that makes sense.