Ray Wanderlich tutorials are good quality, but I don’t really like the way he writes.
I recommend to look at this site, he’s a really “clean” teacher
-13 karma · joined January 15, 2017
I recommend to look at this site, he’s a really “clean” teacher
When will Jetbrain have a decent interface builder?
Decent instrumentation?
Decent documentation viewer?
Can you get an object graph with JetBrains?
Xcode isn't perfect, but it's way better than JetBrains.
Just because one has one feature that one doesn't have, doesn't mean that Xcode beats JetBrain's IDE all day.
I wish they would give developers a royalty free library for our App demo videos.
My project was a floppy disk drive, a floppy disk drive that had an LCD, which totally makes sense...
You are not getting the focal distance and zoom of a 70-200.
When he says that the P10 camera is the same thing as the iPhone 7 Plus...
Just a tip.
Also the MBP Touch Bar has a TDP that is much higher than the Surface Laptop, only the low end MBP has the same TDP of all the SL.
So, no, the Microsoft product is MUCH SLOWER.
We practically don't know anything besides a couple of photos, some information that might or might not be false, a few not myth-busted myths, and opinions from people that don't know much about it but want to voice it.
It has the slowest and most limited I/O in the world: voice, and people think it's the future?
Seriously?
Google Now on Tap (which they cut out, so it seems) was far more impressive innovation, and the way computers should work in the future.
For example, node.js, many people say its popular because lots or webdevs knew JS already, but that's not even close to true, most people went to node.js because they found a couple of usable libraries on npm that gave the trust necessary to start the project.
They keep attributing patents that are obvious and meaningless.
"We are backing nuclear"
"This time it will be good"
Can you see a populist saying that?
These are the cameras that need a sturdy tripod or powerful flashes to take advantage of.
More of a marketing tool than a reasonable photography tool.
2. No it doesn't, I did everything.
3. It appears first result on the AppStore.
For example, when I search for my App name, pirate sites come first, and when I search for functionality keywords, 2011 blog posts from Apps that have been disappeared off the map appear first.
When I was writing my thesis, Google Scholar offered no help. Engineering Village did everything.
Google emphasises too much on blogs and other ephemeral content, which as we all know, is often written in a careless manner, rarely maintained, and even just completely made-up. Google doesn't understand that, and I don't think it's accidental.
What you expect? You're not a big company like Google or Apple that owns the land.
Do you think that, for example, youtubers aren't farmers in the google's farm?
Or that web developers and content creators aren't farmers for the ad networks?
Not really, one thing is revenue, another thing is profit.
Those spammy sites pay a lot of money to appear on those clickbait tables that appear at the end of articles. And without guarantee that the user (victim) buys anything.
If it runs fine on a iPhone 5, it runs better on an iPhone 7.
You are not writing drivers, you don't need to optimize anything.
They don't want you to come from a web page that you arrived from after a google search or a facebook ad.
They want you to go to the AppStore app first. And search there and see advertisements there.
However, in the old days, you could get away with fake news, and today, you can get away with fake news (even break the law, because it's the internet, and you can write in English and have .com or .us domain in whichever country you want), and it's even lucrative to do so!