With cryptocurrency, it's possible to insider trade using completely pseudonymous/anonymous wallets and exchanges (outside of coinbase).
Coinbase will obviously fire anyone who did insider trading using a Coinbase wallet, but who would be that dumb?
703 karma · joined December 21, 2014
With cryptocurrency, it's possible to insider trade using completely pseudonymous/anonymous wallets and exchanges (outside of coinbase).
Coinbase will obviously fire anyone who did insider trading using a Coinbase wallet, but who would be that dumb?
This makes me mad at your app, and very slightly less likely to use your software.
Good luck measuring my slight disdain.
there may be some good ideas buried under all this bullshit marketing buzzwordery, we'll probably find out next year
Spitballing, but this could give a user a 1-month or 1-year or any kind of lockout condition by attempting to access it with a lockout-designated private key, along with a way to provide "proof of lockout" to deter attackers from continuing the wrench beating.
I'm actually impressed with how well the SEC has been able to differentiate between legitimate cryptocurrencies and scam projects.
But amazon didn't take the bullet. The seller of the mattress took the bullet.
Amazon didn't lose a penny.
Sellers just have to assume a 10% loss of gross margin due to issues like this. It's not the end of the world, but that's where the cost is.
Do we really want users to have to understand DevOps six-nines infrastructure reliability, disaster recovery, and stay ahead of the infosec curve in order to hold cash? Not only is the unacceptable for mainstream consumers, i'd argue it's unacceptable for all but the 1% most savvy enthusiast power-users.
How on earth do people use USD?! It's so complicated!
# I like Self-Driving Cars Using Docker Components
# Elon Musk says he will be more than a secret artificial intelligence
# Show HN: A web browser for harassment in 2017
# Slack is the future of the world
# China has died