It doesn't look like they update it more than once a year. I guess we'll see where we stand next January (if we make it that long)
1,027 karma · joined June 24, 2022
It doesn't look like they update it more than once a year. I guess we'll see where we stand next January (if we make it that long)
enum MyEnum { Ok(u8), NotOk }
fn main() {
let value = MyEnum::Ok(42);
assert!(matches!(value, MyEnum::Ok(_)));
match value {
MyEnum::Ok(x) => assert_eq!(x, 42),
MyEnum::NotOk => unreachable!(),
}
}
No unsafe to be found. The feature is there, it just has a different keyword than you might be used to -- the same way Haskell and Java both have something called "class" that mean different things.In other words, he used his own private key to send a transaction. How is that "hacking"?
https://old.reddit.com/r/applehelp/comments/un9rjb/airdrop_h...
Windows has an existing convention for this, like Linux's XDG. Imagine if you looked at your Linux filesystem root and saw /boot, /dev, /usr, /tmp, and /Quicken.
I haven't done JS for awhile, but according to https://docs.cypress.io/api/commands/type#Events they still don't support it. The docs point you to a third party package that tries to simulate it inside the page.
And INT_MIN is a better place for it than zero imo. If Rust had a `BalancedI32` I would reach for it a lot more than I use the NonZero types. In my code at least, I've found zero is a pretty useful number.
> Reviewer's suggestions for your text:
> Looks like this text is perfect!
If anyone would like to publish my paper, contact me. Email in bio.
The cynic in me thinks they like having the extra revenue.
A couple games have riffed on this:
If usage is high - fees will be high, and the cost of an attack will be high.
Security scales with usage, as does the incentive to attack. As long as usage trends in the same direction as value, I don't see the problem.