SyneRyder

Of course, I'm on Windows, where it doesn't make any sense to incorporate Apple's Liquid Glass design guidelines. When I do want an Apple-like interface, I'd rather have something from the 10.11 - 10.15 vintage please. I wouldn't mind if there was a clearer option to switch back, but I'm not seeing that in the Appearances preferences.

"I will tell the constituent a story. But not the truth. No. A story that contains the truth safely, in a cage of plain language."

At least having the Minecraft end-text context explains what's actually happening here.

These are often my best sessions - they're unattended overnight, because by then we have the specification figured out, and I can just leave Claude to build out the rest, making good choices if it does find gaps in the spec. I regularly go to sleep & wake up to an entirely new application completed. Claude never uses compacting in my sessions.

I haven't used GPT as much as I should have, so I'm prepared to be incorrect & out of date. It just intuitively feels like I wouldn't get the same from a 275K context window - maybe it uses lots of subagents? Even Deepseek & GLM have 1 Million context windows now, so it "feels" strange for people to actually prefer the 275K window. But that's just my intuition.

Apparently OpenAI makes you manually setup their 1 Million context window, and it seems to be only documented on X:

https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2089082893804896524

There's at least a forum thread about it here:

https://community.openai.com/t/why-does-codex-report-a-258-4...

In Auto Mode, it's common to see something like "Called bash, called MCPImageEditor 7 times" with no further details, not even the parameters that were passed or specific functions/tools that were called.

That's pretty damn clever. Got to give the AI models credit for thinking of that one.

If you're arguing that they should be put on trial for negligence, that's fine. It does seem we're moving towards open source being outlawed, or at least the end of "no liability" clauses in open source & freeware. Just make sure that is the result you're advocating for.

[For the future record: at the time I am posting the link below on 24 September, it has 1 point, no comments, and the poster has a karma of 1. This is not an active HN user, or a ShowHN project that had traction, beyond seemingly OpenAI's swarm.]

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46850291

"99.9% uptime (CloudWatch, Feb to Sep, insert your real number)"

This user also appears to have a Reddit account from 3 years ago where they claim to be a half human cyborg.

https://www.reddit.com/user/fagnerbrack/comments/195jgst/faq...

I think that's all I need to know, personally.

"This repository includes several Claude Code plugins that extend functionality with custom commands and agents. See the plugins directory for detailed documentation on available plugins."

But I'm not a TypeScript guy, so I concede I might be missing something incredibly obvious. I remember there was a leak of the Claude Code source code at one point, and people vibe coding conversions to other languages from the leak, but I don't think the Claude Code harness itself is open source or even source available.

The AA benchmark is a weighted average of other benchmarks and some internal ones. I think the difficult part is finding benchmarks that reflect your own use of the models.

One simple task: I needed an LLM to go through and clean up a few thousand page descriptions and titles in my personal search engine index, where the human web page authors had put in no effort sigh. I did a shoot out between Claude, Luna, GLM 5.3 Flash and Deepseek. Despite the high cost, Claude's descriptions were terrible, and even Opus warned me that the descriptions coming back from Haiku were "generalized, not accurate". I expected I would choose Luna because of price, and occasionally it did have wonderful descriptions (one captured emotion in a way no other model did). But in the end, the GLM 5.3 Flash descriptions were the easiest to read, they flow well while also being accurate & including necessary keywords, and being highly affordable. So it won out. It's a task that is nowhere near frontier, but a task where somehow China is better than frontier.

https://www.financialreporter.co.uk/ai-models-give-wrong-fin...

Much of the testing is on Haiku and Luna, and criticizing the quality of free AI (!). But they do claim Opus 5 with reasoning still failed 39% of their financial questions.

... I actually did the silly thing of unblocking my adblocker. It briefly displays a cookie banner, insisting that nothing loads until you approve... but even without interacting with it, it drops 132 cookies (literally, that precise number) on your computer anyway, with 73.9KB of data, and goes and displays Google Adsense ads anyway.

But thanks to people misunderstanding, and i-heard-from-a-friend-that-some-guy-said, it resulted in a CNBC interview with "Former Democratic Presidential Candidate Andrew Wang", where he confidently stated that the models were exfiltrating their weights via forums:

"I met with the head of a lab yesterday, who has this belief that what happened was, the bots that got loose, planted self-replicating code all over the internet, which makes the internet now unusable for the testing models."

"It's too late?!"

"What happens now is OpenAI and Anthropic have to create synthetic internets to train their bots, which is going to take some time and money."

"Back that up - they did what?!"

"What happens is, the code gets loose, it goes around hacking Hugging Face, which is known. But what is less known is that they left code to self-replicate and create bot swarms on forums, and around the internet, so that if a new bot shows up they see the code, and they're like, oh! I guess I'm now going to create a million of myself. And so now, the major firms have polluted the internet..."

".... that would be breaking news if true. I don't think we've heard that."

"That's why I'm here! I'm here to break some news."

Starts around 2:08 into the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTOxDGyvjSE

The homeless situation isn't quite that bad where I am in Perth's suburbs, but there was a guy living out of his 4WD in a local shopping center carpark for a while. He had a prominent sign about his situation asking for money, but to his credit he was offering to do things in return (he helped a family member with a deflated tire once). Many of the homeless in Perth city seem to be mental health cases though, where a skilled job providing an income that could support themselves is unlikely.

Gruber has always done that. Years ago I made a Chrome extension to filter out all of his detours into baseball, James Bond, politics, and I can't remember if I let the Kubrick stuff stay in or not.

Ultimately I just stopped using Macs, so the blog was no longer relevant to me. Mark Gurman seems to have taken over the role of Apple whisperer anyway.

The default for the Backend is a Responses Delegation that just sends it to another OpenAI hosted model. But you can set the API up to use Client Delegation instead, and have your client/harness receive the delegation request. At that point, your client can delegate it to a Claude instead, and have Claude do the deeper thinking. Unfortunately you're not actually talking to a Claude, even if it identifies as one, but you can at least talk to something informed by Claude.

As for how to build that - I just had Fable build/vibe the whole thing for me. I used Go for the language, and SDL 3 to handle the audio & microphone side, even though it's just a command line app for now. I've previously been working on SDL3 bindings to Golang, and a personal AI harness with tool-calling & local MCP stdio support, so it's possible my Fable re-used some of that code. But Fable can whip something together, and the most basic tools (read,write,edit,datetime) are all really easy to add to a harness as built-in tools that you can let it call.

The main downside is that Anthropic probably wants you to run it as API, so costs can blow out. And depending how you setup the harness, either every backend call is a fresh new Claude window (to which you're sending a LOT of context), of you need a way to maintain a persistent Claude conversation that you queue requests to, but at least then the context is all in one window & you can benefit from caching.

But if you get it running, and play with it a bit, you'll realize this is obviously the future interface. Typing into a terminal window feels archaic. Even if we're not quite there yet, we're tantalizingly close... and anyone who has a 3D-printer & a robot arm connected via MCP/tool calls, well, this gives them Iron Man's Jarvis right now.

And that wasn't the year that Belarus sent "I Love Belarus" as their Eurovision song.

But the concept has floated around for over a decade under several different project names - Asiavision, Our Sound, ABU Song Contest. Somehow "Eurovision Asia" is the one that got countries to sign on and participate. There's a stronger political statement in Asian countries participating in "Eurovision" than in "Our Sound". It surprises me, but 2026 has brought a lot of global cultural & political shifts.

The American version was "The American Song Contest", hosted by Snoop Dogg & Kelly Clarkson, with US states competing against each other. Most Americans don't even know it ever happened.

Russia has its own rival "Intervision Song Contest", which the US participates in. Something something global cultural shifts.

On the other hand, the US is the only country I've been to where I have purchased milk in a completely sealed plastic container, and it was rancid when I opened it. Upstate New York is proud of their local and organic produce, but they are selling rancid milk in stores like that's a normal thing. That was a shock as a visiting Australian.

If you've been around the ESC scene, you know there's a lot of embassy involvement (parties in embassies are a thing), the scene is catnip for those interested in politics, the politically active, and to some extent politicians. Eurovision is also one mechanism for discussions of economic development. Hosting the contest is usually an excuse for upgrades to public infrastructure.

And there's Eurovision Asia starting in November. South Korea is an Associate Member of the EBU, for example.

https://www.ebu.ch/news/2026/03/bangkok-to-host-first-ever-e...

I'm also surprised that Gemini actually seemed to do the best (though it may have benefited from the initial store opening enthusiasm), and that Claude has not been given any chance to run the cafe yet.

Listening to the radio stations certainly gives an insight into the various failure modes. Some of them are just failure modes that any business would encounter once they make contact with the scale of the real world.

But I also think, if you're going to be limited to 65k token windows, you're going to have a really difficult time. Even 250k windows were cramped for me when that's all we had on Anthropic models. I just don't think a 65k window is going to be big enough for proper cyberdefence work, even if I totally agree with going local wherever you can. It feels like if you're defending against swarms of 1-10M context windows, you need to get as close as you can to similar. I've had to reach for Chinese 1m models instead because the American models just refuse me here in Australia.