92 karma · joined August 16, 2009
http://www.mogotix.com http://www.startuptrader.com http://www.blockpire.com http://www.editpage.co
http://www.hackernewsers.com/users/Sthorpe.html
Phone:
510.517.4459
We promise not to drunk dial you.
Thanks for the feedback.
Maybe your just implying that there isn't really any need to read an article from Murdoch unless its free?
Right now I'm looking for something like a fractal. Where we get large constructs out of a small equation.
Every great company had been started from several small innovations. I knew youtube or any site that was playing video with flash was going to be big. Its because we had just developed the flash player to do it.
I learned then that playing with any new idea/software gave me much more than some curiosity.
Every time I find websites like this, I immediately think its simple and limited, yet efficient. But I do dislike this website. This company/website doesn't align with my idea of a new communication tool. However, the latest "web 2.0" site doesn't give me inspiration either. It is full of a bunch of pretty lights and distracting content.
Some times I wonder if the web needs a paradigm shift. Starting to think we are over engineering it when we should be focusing on specific function.
Seriously, why would anyone "break" themselves? I thought we were just learning from our mistakes...
I am very productive these days. I think when you truly love what you do, being an entrepreneur is just something you can tell people so they understand _why_ you don't work for someone.
I've worked at 9 - 6 before. I will never go back. Mostly because of the reward for not breaking myself and forgetting about what I love.
I mean how many people just like the joy of creating something for themselves and no one else. I do.
How do we agree as a group and yet continue to think independently? We have to agree on some things...right?
- Not sure I agree with your comment about women vs men with status. I believe that no matter what the information is, the social dynamic is different given a smaller group/context. It helps all of us narrow the focus.
- No clue why I keep hearing this love of hierarchy, respect and accountability. Whats wrong with just having something worth talking about? I think we all have a voice, maybe not the best tools to deliver it. But I think that's our job. :)
Maybe only thoughtful discussions can be had when a group is limited to a certain size and status is defined by the most original discussions. Not by the most accepted.
Honestly, I am poor. Dirt poor. But I LOVE what I do. I consult to pay the bills. Right now, I'm hyper focused on starting a new business so I haven't been spending a lot of time getting new clients.
I had a client that fell on my lap the other day and I was so frustrated with them. The only reason they wanted to start their company was to make a lot of money and get rich. No passion, no iconoclastic idea's. Just, lets do this because it will make money.
I would love to see less money grubbing jerks and more passionate people who just love to create stuff. So i'm with Eric in getting the word out. This won't make you rich! Only do this if you love it. *pushes aside pulpit.
Besides if you don't use direct references you have to rely on assumptions. Which makes us all speak babble.
I've had this problem to. Some information you just don't care about. However, you do care about some of it or you wouldn't have "friended" them. My system will allow you to see as much as you like, with a type of valve on the relationship.
I don't want to encourage adding points to people. I could see it becoming more of a who's better than the other person. Which is a system I don't want to be apart of. I would rather build tools that will help us strengthen our friendships and help us to appreciate our differences.
I think facebook apps are dead. However I think facebook connect and twitter's api are very useful and more applicable.
Thanks again.