SmoothBrain12

Yes, but they won't clock as fast because they'll be waiting for RAM.

What a time to be alive

Exactly, it's not too hard to implement in C. The one I made never copied data, instead saved the pointer/length to the data. The user only had to Memory Map the file (or equivalent), pass that data into the parse. Only memory allocation was for the Jason nodes.

This way they only paid the parsing tax (decoding doubles, etc..) if the user used that data.

You hit the nail on the head

Your thoughts are valid. AI.com is the Pets.com of this generation

Thank you

Exactly, they cannot get paid from a bankrupt company. Some kind of payment schedule would be arranged

Exactly. I find splitting your struct into 2 structs based on memory access patterns(1 used all the time and the other for data) is a huge win.

Good

Guy discovers wave guide, mistakes it for 4th dimension.

^^^ This programmer gets it

It's possible to thread the compilation at the function level. Example: Jai.

Ghost guns meet ghost AI

Meh. In your article, you could always mark the function f() as pure or const and get the hoist

<Click here if you're over 18>

Some people want to change the world. Others want to go slow and want a life.

Why not leave those who want to go faster and change the world alone? There are other companies.

Ron Paul

At some point, isn't it better to build your own database? And choose the trade offs that fit your project. Or pay/hire someone to do it.