2,906 karma · joined July 3, 2012
Does this mean that SpaceX are the only company that really did build some datacenters to put all the million of GPU/TPU/whatever they all talk about everyday?
I mean, Google, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft told investors they spent more than $1B per day last year in CapEx... why on Earth do they (well, Google and Anthropic at least) need to rent compute to SpaceX, of all companies?
Of course, each relevant newspaper on those areas highlight that it's coming to their place, but it really seems to be distributed.
I am quite shocked by such lack of care, and it does tarnish the reputation of Cloudflare in my eyes :/
The AI stuff that the original LiveKit company put on top of it (to pivot to more investor-friendly endeavours) is not that relevant in this case, in my humble opinion.
A single line comment is easy to parse, read and spot as having to be changed when you patch something.
(Disclaimer: I am not an anti-AI guy — I am just listing the common talking points I see in my feeds.)
Let's note that because the clients are fully open-source and on GitHub, people from Expo and React Native are helping the little team behind the clients improve performance over time: it's not their final form!
Wow. It's one thing to create value on top of one of the most respected open source projects in a field, it's quite another to bash it as the opening sentence of your blog post.
It really rubs me the wrong way.
I mean, words have meanings. It's not because Google laid off part of the teams that worked on those technologies that it means that they dropped support of them.
Unique install per user per year.
Instead, what I found was a reminder of the ‘laws of design’, which are certainly interesting, but which are only tangentially linked to this drift (in my opinion); and to take the most extreme example of sparse interfaces (the Bloomberg Terminal), without really any concrete elements that could help bring a little density back to our user interfaces.
...not to mention what ends the article, a lunar explanation along the lines of ‘Google's very high stock market valuation compared to Yahoo can be explained by the lack of density of its home page interface’ - really? Come on.
I won't make a bet on which one, because I don't want to nag, but we all know which one it will be.
I used to carry some cash for my nearest automatic laundery machines, but even that one now features a contactless payment dongle, so it's nearly useless for me.
† I say "credit card", but most plastic card WE carry on France are actually debit card, i.e. there is no specific credit card balance to top or anything, it's directly withdrawned from your account. (There is something hybrid called "differed debit card", that mimic some of the credit card experience, but it's basically buffering your withdrawals, without any "true" credit happening).
Nintendo wasn't helping the e-sport scene before, but with those move, I think they are now actively trying to kill it in its current form.
It is... slow? I mean, Internet Explorer slow. Maybe I'm spoiled by the level of responsiveness of application-style web interfaces, but opening an album or returning to the library feels slow. Is it because I'm browsing from Western Europe and the application is hosted in the USA?
I'm used to browsing multi-page apps that don't pretend to be apps, and having a 500ms load time after a click is expected and feels right. But waiting the same time for a click in a page that looks like an app makes me uncomfortable. It's weird - is this the Uncanny Valley again?
Well, it goes somewhere: people are actually being driven around Pheonix, Arizona [0] using those cars. It's just that it is not named "Google self-driving cars" any more: it was spun into its own company, Waymo [1].
[0]: https://waymo.com/waymo-one-phoenix/
[1]: https://waymo.com/
> Simpler rules on cookies: the cookie provision, which has resulted in an overload of consent requests for internet users, will be streamlined. The new rule will be more user-friendly as browser settings will provide an easy way to accept or refuse tracking cookies and other identifiers. The proposal also clarifies that no consent is needed for non-privacy intrusive cookies that improve internet experience, such as cookies to remember shopping-cart history or to count the number of website visitors.
[0]: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eprivacy-r...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29465729
…in which Cloudflare's CEO directly address the first point (having a legacy clause in their Terms that used to prohibit benchmarking, clause they removed quickly after), and in which one of the main engineer behind Cloudflare Workers underline that there is "apple vs oranges" comparisons for a while from Fastly before that blogpost.
I really recommand reading those previous discussions, you'll learn a lot about the context of this blogpost and what Cloudflare think of it!
Wait what? It's OVHcloud, not "Deutsche Telekom OVHcloud". There is no mention of any relationship between the two companies beside a common project named "Gaia-X" which is still in a very very early stage of planning.
This doesn't inspire confidence in the journalist.
I understand that this makes sense, but at the same time, I wonder how many tons of CO₂ will be emitted because of this kind of "onshoring".
How did you achieve that? Are there some shortcuts you took, or some feature you deemed not in scope (yet)?
Some technical workshops [1] are being organized with interested stakeholders to receive their views on specific issues and questions that may arise in relation to the specific implementing measures by gatekeepers that are to ensure effective compliance with that legislation.
[0]: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-...
[1]: https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/dma/dma-workshops_en