81 karma · joined August 22, 2023
In the UK, credit card use is widespread even for in person purchases. By legislation it provides extra protection, for example by Section 75 (https://www.experian.co.uk/consumer/credit-cards/guides/sect...)
Today it is much more of a binary experience. A game either runs smoothly out of the box or does not run at all. And the latter is the exception, not the rule.
But now it happened in FAANG so it burst the bubble of the proportionally few who used to feel special.
Apple provides a backdoor into Chinese citizens' iCloud to the Chinese government, while praising itself as the bastion of privacy.
Doing so because of money is all the more hypocritical.
The trackpad is terrible though.
I work daily with LLVM and haven't noticed any slowdown in contributions by employees from Google or Apple.
The receipt only contains the number of votes for each candidate. It does not validate if X people actually have voted in candidate A. So if the machine transfer a certain number of votes between candidates, it does not raise any flags.
Such scenario can be detected by printed vote receipts in addition to the electronic ballot.
Watch the video I posted.
There are plenty of examples of flaws in the voting system. Most of them have been corrected, but not all.
Yes, fraud is widespread with paper voting. But it does not scale. One single flaw in an electronic voting system could scale to every single voting machine, thus impacting even presidential elections.
As a matter of public interest, the source code should be open for all.
So if the machine somehow subtracts 256 votes from one candidate and transfers them to another, the total remains the same and this discrepancy isn't caught.
It sounds ludicrous, but actually has happened before: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaZ_RSt0KP8
This is just one example of how the Brazilian system isn't ideal. The criticism against it is very well supported by sound arguments, and it's a shame that it got politicised. It's a pure technical matter.