Maybe you’ll start to have thoughts of your own, and develop your own philosophical ideas.
I’d also recommend “The Metaphysics of Nothing”
7 karma · joined September 1, 2026
Email if needed: sethmichealcombs@gmail.com
Maybe you’ll start to have thoughts of your own, and develop your own philosophical ideas.
I’d also recommend “The Metaphysics of Nothing”
Who else had heard of it before this article?
But, I’d truly love for the thing to stay in contact for the first few thousand.
Wouldn’t you?
Just, possible.
I’m not relying on the radiation to power it.
But rather, it’s own decay process.
That’s what they used.
The slower it decays, the more you’d need,
But the longer it decays, the longer it’s powered.
Which is why plutonium seemed so perfect.
But, we simply would’ve needed a little more time,
And it’d have been done,
With radium.
I really hope that other countries [cough, America, cough] follow suit.
We’re too late to skip the Climate Clock, but it’s not unsalvageable!
We’ll lose the ability to function as a society on our own,
Such as A.I. surveillance technologies,
They are the future, unfortunately,
Also very unfortunately, they’re just the start,
Humans tend to be lazy and creepy,
Both of which are enabled by A.I. surveillance,
These little “Flock Cameras” are merely the start.
An A.I. cult tried, and still tries, to do the same,
And it still does strange things, and doesn’t work fully.
Now, I acknowledge that these are different tasks, but the premise is similar,
And failing.
Humans are humans, A.I. is not.
Although, it could very well develop into a new “Mentally Humanoid” species.
It may be cheaper and faster, but it makes more mistakes than a satellite and humans ever would.
For example: A human would (Hopefully) never see a river, and think “ROAD’, but rather, mark only roads as roads.
A.I. is still basically being “Globally Beta Tested” and shouldn’t be used to replace humans in any way other than basic research and simple tasks, NOT mapping our planet.
I feel that all countries should be doing something similar.
Not at all.
A.I. shouldn’t be the one to complete these things,
Especially not something like this, because we would’ve done it on our own eventually.
Another example of this is A.I. solving math problems with rewards attached,
It strips away the opportunity from someone who could’ve done it on their own,
Instead, A.I. did it before anyone had the right idea.
I encourage all of you to give simple pushback such as this.
And incredibly helpful to the right people.
You have a wonderful idea, and made it reality.
Good job!
We need more innovative people like you in the world.
I’m really glad we don’t need things like it anymore.
The hack/leak, I mean. We still need the codes, probably.
Not everyone is open to letting an A.I. review private things.
It makes mistakes hourly, or likely every minute it’s being used.
I understand that they’d likely use a better, more professionally model, but it’s nowhere near perfect.
A human can analyze better than any A.I. at the moment, and it needs to stay that way.
Especially now that we can physically view the genome.
Say… Fifty years ago, we might have just called it a deformed Leopard, and moved on with our lives.
Hell, maybe we already did, and this was just the first time someone connected the dots.
But, I’m open to absolutely anything to slow it, even a little bit.
I’m pretty sure that’s not how math works.
That’s great, actually.
???
Are you?