SJWDisagree111

So you are mentally ill. Yet you feel justified giving advice on the internet.

The slut categorization is Correct. There is no such analog as a slut for males. Females choose the mating structure not men. A man is not able to sleep with unlimited women, yet most women can sleep with unlimited men if they desire.

Mistress has multiple definitions and is more a social construct than something you can see in a picture so I'm not sure how they come to a conclusion on that one. There do seem to be lots of BSDM style photos in that set which makes sense as that is the only discreet physical definition of a "mistress"

"foolish woman" Usually people say "idiot guy" but that comes up with Television which is often referred to as "Idiot box"

"Honest Woman" is defined on their site and seems to search accordingly. Also it is a common saying which probably matches the expected results of most searchers. Synset: honest woman Definition: a wife who has married a man with whom she has been living for some time (especially if she is pregnant at the time); "he made an honest woman of her".

The classification seems to be based off common speech usages and seems to be adhering to them.

Usually its "idiot guy" not "foolish guy"

You admit you like kinky/deviant sexual stuff so why do you care what others think?

Well the hard truth is you are trying to dishonestly maintain your sexual market value. You know they type of girl that high value men like and you don't want to limit your options. However you are not that person.

(and SJW oblivion shall commence)

Also who says "my entourage" when referring to their friends?

Funny how the simple truth summarizes issues like this.

How about we apply it to governance with complete transparency to the electorate. Nope, not going to happen. Because its exploitative and intrusive and will only be applied to the powerless lowest who have no choice.

Rural yes. There are not enough shelters or public assistance to support the homeless population. I imaging your mileage may vary based on the specific metro area. I'm specifically referring to the southeast. Also at least Chicago as well my cousin is a librarian there and constantly has stories about how her job is essentially running a halfway house.

Holy crap what communities are you referencing? 90210? I'm in the south so basically any public library within walking distance of a metro area. As I said in my comment most people on HN are seriously out of touch with what the majority of the population experiences.

I'm guessing most of the people here have not been to a local public library in a long time. They have basically become daytime homeless shelters. That is the reason they are no longer attractive for philanthropists.

The problem here is that there actually is a biological disadvantage that women possess in regard to career success. That disadvantage is that on average 100% of children are born from women. Additionally on average 100% men do not bear children. Due to this statistical anomaly even if only a small percent of women; say 10% decide to have children there will be a measurable disadvantage/bias towards the male gender in the workforce for a simple reason. A person carrying a child even on a most optimistic outlook must spend a least a tiny percent of their time dealing with the fact they are pregnant. This includes hormone levels, energy, medical issues and general physiological inconvenience. Furthermore this inconvenience lasts a minimum of 9 months and reasonably even a year. During this time of less than maximum career effort a man will never suffer such setbacks and is theoretically able to devote nearly 100% of his effort to career advancement.

Until we either have artificial wombs or completely change the laws dealing with childbearing to deal with the actual childbearing rather than serve an outdated form of social contract (marriage) there will never be a true resolution.