104 karma · joined October 18, 2019
No one has ever had a fully reusable orbital rocket.. still to this day. Althought starships got a shot.
Sure, if we build a million rockets it'll be cheaper, but how do we USE those rockets and get funding at "relative peace time". SpaceX's real innovation was starlink in allowing it to "Soak up" excess production. Besides the obvious of reusability, which wasn't that "Obvious" considering the temperatures of reentry.
The fact that a gland could arise through natural selection makes over 112 different components from anti-biotics to chemicals blows my mind.
The underlying theory that "random mutation" and errors in the copying of ant DNA created a secretion sac is crazy to me. I imagine this first ant was like the "Mule" in foundation, where he could introduce chemicals to "Control and conquer". There seems to be some underlying learning mechanism built within "Random mutation".
Can't ants be swapped out as humans here?
Tesla has much different goals than the other car manufacturers. Although energy sales are only around 5% of total revenue, Tesla expects that to change going forward.
But what you get at the end with something like 3000 parts in it's BOM, to something like 20 parts in the BOM, because most of the parts were deleted and integrated directly into the mold.
$44m per booster starts to sound like a more reasonable number.
Keep in mind that the RS-25's cost $100m each. If it was atlas, the engines alone would cost $3.6B.
building the header tanks in the first place, and testing them is the interation style. If the starship blows up, the header tanks are the least of your worries.
The unions negotiate for "All workers" under some kind of umbrella terms that has only sometimes specific prescriptions towards individual companies but always towards industries as a whole. They can dictate things like medical, vision, dental, sometimes day care. But they can also dictate things like work hours, safety, etc.
That all sounds gravy, but what if a company like Tesla wants to dictate 60 hour work weeks for all it's engineers. But that goes against Union Law, so they can't. But what if that's just how the people in the company, and people within that company want to work. That's how Tesla works. When you are getting of job at Tesla, you know exactly that you are signing up for long work hours. It's a company with everyone putting in 70 hour weeks for around 2 years, and springboard into another startup at a higher role, or more cushy FANG.
To give another example from another industry that would not work is the oil fields. We have the OCAW union here in the US but get like 1/4 of what the non-union jobs get. Because OCAW dictates work hours, and a salary but not time to rig. the non-unionized guys go out and work for 18 hours straight, sleep on a the rig for a bit, and get back to work. Again, not allowed under union contract, but if you do that for a couple days and make a bunch of money. Because we have worker pay, OSHA, etc. There is no need for unions here because the minimum labor standards for overtime pay and safety are set by federal standards not the "Union".
"Collective Bargaining" has lost it's sense of "Collective" at the scale it has grown. True collective bargaining has always been by the individuals themselves. Forcing Tesla on a blanket union contract instead specific clauses and prescriptions that they need to implement to be compliant is legalease non-sense.
Does strong union actually result in better pay? If you compare the average software salary from the US to Sweden, it seems like it's doing the opposite, no?
Location: Los Angeles, California
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: Yes
Technologies: Custom Software Development, Cyber Security Standards (NIST53, Fedramp), Cloud DevOps
Email: Lrhoades@ryloconsulting.com (Website is GSAcontractpros.com)
As a former Contracting Officer in the Air Force, I utilize my experience on both sides of the negotiating table to help IT companies Find-Write-Win both Federal and State level contracts.I have helped numerous companies with contract capture, bid writing, federal competitive analytics, and pricing agreements with over $108M in career wins.
the most common challenges I’ve seen are a lack of:
- Streamlined procedures around Contract Capture, - Outreach to Contracting Officers, - Access to the best deals (oftentimes requiring Pricing Agreements).
After working nearly 10 years in the industry I have developed a holistic offering to government contracting. Including automations and LLM’s across scraping RFX’s, filtering for scope, and developing a base proposal. These workflows and automations will allow me to submit multiple projects a week with complete autonomy after initial integrations.
Next Steps: Let’s set up a call, where I can share my screen and show you the tools I’ve developed to expand your marketing funnel and win more public contracts.
Kinda different, kind of the same but i'd love to use an app with much better search than the 'direct search' currently in most aggrogrator/ note apps. If i searched 'quotes' it would rip out and return all the things in italized, in quotes, or things that the algorithm deems as quotes based on it's scrape of the internet; Kinda like google but 'personal search' based on my notes, articles, all my different emails (work, and my 37 different gmail accounts) and websites I frequent (like reddit, hacker news comments, etc.) There was an HN article the other day that got me thinking about this problem, but i can't seem to find it. However, it approached it from a much deeper technical level, utilizing emacs and searching through his code. If you could bring that into an easy to use, consumer facing GUI I think it'd have potential to be pretty game changing.
'Personalized Search, and we don't have to steal your data because you willingly give it to us' - Google