110 karma · joined January 18, 2015
It might be perfectly legal, you still would not want that to happen and people expressing their concerns should never be shrugged off with the simplistic attitude of "but they are allowed to do that".
A lot of things which are allowed for a company is still not the right thing and should be called out.
What is the advantage of using Facebook to keep in touch with people that I'm missing?
Failing is just as important aspect of a self-regulated system as is the price, since the government voided that mechanism since forever we have an entirely disrupted market perfectly conditioned for too-big-to-fail participants.
Part of the problem is the broken status of international copyright law and the many incompatible local laws and regulations. If the international community could at least settle for an standard approach to digital distribution over the internet, the world would be a happier place for consumers.
Sadly at the moment that's only WhatsApp and Telegram to some extent. If only there would be some protocol or standard that would allow me to communicate across different providers.
But unfortunately such a standard must be technologically impossible, otherwise it would be implemented and widespread already.
The extension interface of Libre Office even lets me think that this would be technically a triviality to integrate.
Maybe with an open standard instead of a propriety and closed eco system,
with the freedom to choose whom you trust with your data, or to host it yourself.
I'm afraid your point is still not clear. What's your metric for declaring a market irrelevant?
A conventional office suite is still the solution which is overwhelmingly dominating the market. Maybe look outside your own bubble and bias. A lot of business will never give away there confidential documents in the hands of third party cloud hosts. (which is the sane approach). So what's your criteria for calling that niche, irrelevant or even non-existent?
That claim contradicts what Glenn Greenwald says. Why is he wrong?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/31/nsa-top-secret-...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_surveillance_disclosure...