disclaimer: found on Google, unsure of context / if these people are core developers, just sharing for those who like me were also confused
909 karma · joined May 26, 2013
disclaimer: found on Google, unsure of context / if these people are core developers, just sharing for those who like me were also confused
If I could get that from a self-hosted option, given Google's... track record... I'd definitely be interested, though it doesn't seem this is quite there yet.
I think there's something to be said for javadoc, cargo doc, etc encouraging documentation to hew closely to the structure of the code as opposed to a free-form documentation system that can include multiple pages about tasks, getting started, etc. But the vast majority of projects don't bother to set that up, and the javadoc approach makes it very low friction to add docs to existing code that probably already has comments explaining how to use it.
Edit: also no mention of this on the PF reddit account: https://www.reddit.com/user/PineappleFund
Most people would agree that talking about your flight "around" the world is OK, even if it takes a side in the somehow-controversial debate on the shape of the earth.
What about talking to your coworkers idly and you mention "Oh yeah I've been keeping my kids at home cause I'm worried about coronavirus". Controversial, some people think that's fake.
Talking about how you got married last month? If you're gay, that's suddenly controversial.
Talking to your manager about how you need to take time off because a family member died, they ask what happened, turns out they were shot by the police? Suddenly very controversial...
Politics isn't some weird abstract thing, it's life and the events that are happening around us every day. If we live in a world where literally the shape of the earth is a marker of political identity -- how do you expect people to avoid mentioning topics that people might find controversial? Or do you think it's possible to draw a stark dividing line somewhere between "shape of earth" and "police reform" that can be justified in an objective way?
it isn't bad grammar, though you could argue it's poor writing because it's confusing. it's using a feature of english called it-extraposition. some examples here: https://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~kay/bcg/extrap.html
basically, it-xp lets you delay a constituent in certain circumstances using "it". sometimes this is required to make a sentence grammatical.
"(What to do next) is not clear"
"It is not clear (what to do next)"
*"Was (who painted this) a child?"
"Was it a child (who painted this)?"
We can combine this feature with clefting the end of the sentence to make something that seems to refer to a person by "it", but actually refers to an elided constituent: Discourse: "I don't know the gender of the writer"
R1: *"Was (who wrote this) a man?" (can't have wh-phrase here, needs it-xp)
R2: "Was it a man (who wrote this)?" (OK, but the last part is redundant. Discourse already includes we are talking about a writer. Grice's maxims suggest we will usually drop it.)
R3: "Was it a man?" (looks weird, but sounds perfectly normal in context)
I'm a linguist / syntactician by training, but also nonbinary and use they/them, so I have some skin in this game. I think the GP was being obtuse, maybe purposely, but not malicious.1, companies all expect you to work in the traditional way with local repos etc. All their tooling is geared towards that. If experienced users who set the standards aren't being migrated over, then they'll reinforce that status quo, and so will people who learned on repl but were forced to migrate off (monkey ladder experiment style).
2., using older tools is a point of pride. There's definitely a strain of "if you use repl.it / etc. and not emacs / vim / vscode you're a noob." This obviously is toxic and not great, but it does exist, and acts as another obstacle to online IDE adoption I think.
Take small checks. People writing small checks is something that's very common in Silicon Valley. I love having a bunch of founder/operator investors to tap in to when we need help. You can see from the image above, we raised over $700k from intros that originated with a small $5k check. If we hadn't taken that small check, we likely would not have connected with many of those other investors.
http://moin.delph-in.net/ErgTop
Online demo:
It has all that information in the generated feature structure -- even more than you can view in the web interface. There's a development environment you can download, as well as a headless linux tool called ACE you can use on a server. The ERG is complex, but far and away the most sophisticated tool in this space.
https://acoup.blog/category/collections/siege-of-gondor/ https://acoup.blog/category/collections/the-battle-of-helms-...
The host VM had this running. Since they had access to the host's network (due to running in a `--network=host` container), they were able to spoof the response from the metadata server to say a new user should be added to `.authorized_keys`, with their supplied public key. The guest agent automatically adds the new users to the `sudoers` group, also giving them sudo access.
Cool business! Good luck!