"Hmm, this monkey looking thing isn't as tasty as a wooly mammoth, but it'll do."
(it's not like chimps don't catch and eat other primates)
2,235 karma · joined June 2, 2010
"Hmm, this monkey looking thing isn't as tasty as a wooly mammoth, but it'll do."
(it's not like chimps don't catch and eat other primates)
There might be some hesitance installing an M5. You should stay out of the way if the machine learning core needs more power.
I guess by the time they get to M5, anyone old enough to get the reference will have retired.
I have 3 iOS devices, but I won’t pay a grand for a phone. I would rather replace my base level devices in 4 or 5 years when they start to age out.
“Ignition” isn’t about generating electricity. It’s about making fusion bombs which don’t emit neutrons or other radiation (from a fission trigger) while the device is in storage.
So, not primarily a power generation design like a tokamak would be.
It’s a startling visualization.
Orange man rushed out a shot. It must be bad.
Gray man said get the shot. It’s good.
I’m not saying that kind of “thinking” is valid, but it’s apparently widely accepted.
(I got the shot, but I can see why some people would have considerations)
China stripping unguarded Atlantic coasts was news to me, though.
Does this fall under violating the First Amendment, or the Second?
I’m joking, but... most higher level languages were tossed aside for “serious” app development. First to use x86 assembly, then “portable assembly” (C). Much of the “worse is better” methodology can be attributed to giving many people computers, but initially very underpowered computers.
Titanium is used in airframes for its strength to weight ratio (it’s not very dense). Tungsten is used in weapons for its high hardness and density.
I’m sure they were still too much carbs, but they had protein and real vegetables, though usually canned.
I’m guessing they want orchestra sounds, and not just analog/subtractive, FM or other digital synth sounds.
It was apparently off limits to discuss how the family of one presidential candidate made so much money overseas for doing so little, and might this have something to do with how a member of that family perceives policy?
If the [redacted] government offers $10 million in “forgivable” loans to a family, might they be expecting to recoup that “investment” in some way?
Nope, nothing to see here, move along citizens. Ignorance is strength.
Yeah, the list of plaintiffs definitely has an axe to grind.
And hey, how about those voting machines, while we’re at it? A solution in search of a problem.
https://zeenews.india.com/world/relief-for-indian-it-profess...
Into the arena for the glory of Rome, I guess. (“Competition”)
Safe to assume views go in the “code” schema with procs/funcs/packages, leaving just tables and sequences (if needed) in the “data” schema?
Considering building a side project using this kind of approach...
The apps I have been working on are monoliths which run at about 2% CPU on the server, so there is no A/B comparison runs in production (e.g. on January 1, some law goes into effect and you WILL implement it). I would happily see ORM usage curb stomped.
(Yeah, Snow Crash hit a little too close to home for me.)
We had an SCO box (among other unices) at the job I worked in the early 90s making software to port RPG code off of IBM minis.
I have been programming since the early 80s, and my experience with JS has been pretty positive, especially compared to the slog through the unreadable mud that is enterprise Java. (If I was going to rage quit on something, it would be the verbose, obtuse, repetitive Java sludge I’ve had to read the last decade and a half)
Typescript solves problems I don’t have. The Jetbrains IDEs do autocomplete just fine on vanilla JS, and the documentation window automatically shows the initialization and any JSDoc for most every symbol the editor cursor touches. I avoid writing code with thousands of global symbols.
OOP languages like Object Pascal and C++ are good for making lemonade from the lemon of manual memory management, but if you have efficient garbage collection, use functional programming techniques rather than OOP bloat, and many self inflicted problems go away.
I hope TS doesn’t turn JS into Enterprise Java, The Next Generation.
Nothing personal, most people seem to prefer that style. Just understand, there is a reason some people run away from the C++ / Java / C# / TS milieu.
I’m biased, though. I HATE gigantic supposedly “self documenting” (but utterly impossible to actually say aloud) identifiers.
My ideal identifiers are 2, maybe 3, syllables, with dashes or underscores, with actual documentation of WHY anything visible beyond The scope of a single function is used.
After a while I put it in reader mode, until it reloaded crapify mode again :-(
Note to Wired staff: surely you can do something that would make people want to return to your site, rather than viewing it as a last resort?