Where was the targeted harassment in Godot's case? Unless you call someone saying "focus on the engine, not on politics" as being harassment.
4,520 karma · joined November 9, 2016
If the CM only blocked that one person with the woke comment and kept quiet, everything would have been fine, but instead she kept antagonizing the community using the woke comment as fuel to start a fire based on her own world and political views as if that one comment represented the whole community, so the community told her to drop it and focus on the product instead not on politics, then she started banning all those people.
If one comment of one person is enough for someone to loose their shit and go on a tirade about identity politics on the org's social media account and ban hundreds of people untreated to the offending comment, they must have some rice paper thin skin, low emotional maturity, or untreated mental issues either of which make them unfit for such positions.
What terrible gaslighting here, shifting the blame from their community manager in charge doing the harassments, to the community itself as being the harassers.
You mean their paying customers/donators?
>But as seen here it can be also extremely destructive position.
That's why you should vet those people and not let in those wishing to use their new position to put down others based on disagreements on personal belief.
How the hell did they decide to give such a person such an important publicly facing job is beyond me.
What would have been the alternative for them? Excluding the US, software is not a high margin business.
The SLI Nvidia used had nothing to do with the tech from 3df besides the initials and the general idea of the concept, especially since the way the Nvidia GPUs worked at the time Nvidia dropped SLI was totally different than the way 3dfx's 3d accelerators worked.
The results of the communist revolutions, especially in Russia, would beg to differ. Instead of being oppressed by the monarchy like they were before, the common people were then oppressed by the soviets. Whoop-de-do. You still have a gun to your head it's just who's behind the trigger that's different.
Would you also apply this logic today? As in, would like a new class turnover in the country you live in hopes to fix the rampant wealth inequality?
Because I don't think the poor would end up killing and robbing the likes of Trump, Biden, Zuckerberg, Bezos or Musk, but most likely the likes of you and me.
Getting new management isn't always a good idea. The rich have the resources to move their wealth and be welcomed somewhere safe like Switzerland or Monaco, while only the poor have to suffer the consequences of the uprising.
By that logic Nazi Germany should also be credited for improving democracy around the world since its war with Britain, France, Netherlands and Belgium made them so weak post-WW2 that it allowed their former colonies to gain independence.
Can you provide the source for that? Because the Wifi 6 enabled Modem from Magenta doesn't support bridge mode.
5% of the population is hardly enough to call them fat but fair enough, seems like the entire world is getting fatter as they become more wealthy and industrialized.
Why only some rich western countries with large disposable incomes and cushy lifestyles have a problem with people eating way too much?
Why do some people in the west (especially the US) always need to outsource the responsibility of their own bad actions and lifestyle choices to "societal factors and culture"?
Am I fat because I'm a lazy pig? No, it's obviously society's and the food's fault lol.
How is that different from a monopoly, other then arguing semantics?