Reubensson

If i was wrong, my bad. You just felt sympathy for the rejected bot and tried to get its changes merged? And made passive aggressive comments about needing a birth certificate

You are the person behind running the LLM bot, right? You opened the second PR to get the same code merged.

Maybe it is you who should a take a breather before direting your bot to attack against the opensource maintainer who was very reasonable to begin with. Use agents and ai to assist you but play by the rules that the project sets for AI usage.

What do you mean that cpu does something different? Isnt cpu doing what is being asked, that being xor with consequence of zeroing when given two same values.

Yeah I suppose. Haven't seen rack of servers express grief when someone is mean to them. And I am quite sure that I would notice at that point. Comparing current LLMs/chatbots whatever to anything resembling a living creature is completely ridiculous.

What the fuck are you talking about. If you think these matrix multiplication programs running on gpu have feelings or can feel pain you, I think you have completely lost it

Youtube used to have a lite premium but they removed that. Sounds very similar but shittier with similar/same price.

Tested the free chat. The chat bot gave slightly incorrect answer, and trustworthiness gave it score of 0.749 and said the answer is completely incorrect, which was not actually the case. Seems more confusing with two answers that are somewhat wrong.

With podman and kube (crio and containerd) you can create mirror config such that the pulls happen from a mirror transparently. Some mirrors also support proxy cache behaviour so you dont in theory have to preload images (though might be necessary with the new limits)

Yeah, not using cookies is irrelevant if you use other means to track user. Also people like to think they need to show the "cookie banner" for all cookies regardless of how they are used.

I was only commenting about DNS part, self signed certificates come with their own lot of trouble. At least I havent ever run into any cache issues with local resolvers.

I have previously used https://github.com/jsha/minica which makes it at least easy to create a root certificate and matching server cert. How to get that root cert trusted on different array of devices is another story.

Couldn't you just add the domain to /etc/hosts and have it resolve that way. No need to buy domain if you are just testing locally. Also you wouldn't be exposing anything to outside world.

I would guess even most of time people using epsilon don't understand it. Its not like there is universal constant error with floating point numbers. I feel that saying just use epsilon is not much better than x == 0 and could be harder to find bugs if it sometimes works and othertimes does not.

A lot of people use. I think it is common at least in Europe but probably varies by country.

I dont think they have abandoned InfluxQL. They are still supporting it in the InfluxDB 3 as far I know. But they are abandoning flux, which was a mess and pain to use.

I think wikipedia does a quite good job explaining what different operations do: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operation

I suppose it should be a link to some resource about Berkeley Packet Filters (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Packet_Filter).

Don't really see a problem using goto there. Simplyfies control flow and error handling. Assuming we are talking about same piece of code.

it doesnt enforce the types in any way

Are you able to create terminal forms with multiple fields at the same time? I tried to look at the examples, but they all had single widget at a time. I used https://github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea on one project, but it felt quite cumbersome to create forms with validation, multiple pages and states etc.

To me it sounds like it boils down to either you release the software or you don't. If you decide to release it into public, I don't think there is much you can realistically do to prevent abuse.

Absolutely agree. I find it easier to learn things when there is problem/goal to work towards.

My favourite projects have been the ones I know little about beforehand (for example llvm frontend for a toy language, gb emulator).

I thought these restrictions were set by UK goverment, not by individual operators.

Edit: I am not sure if age restriction check is responsibility of sites themselves or service providers according to UK law.

Isn't key derivation function completely separate from aes implementation. I mean you could have used the same broken key derivation with some other aes implementation.

Also aes-1024 sounds like some proprietary thingy, not something people should probably trust anyway...

I am sure that if you use a language/library for long enough, its bad design descisions aren't a huge problem to you.

Reading the docs of course helps, but it is still inconvenience and waste of time to check inconsistent parameter order and function naming from docs. I don't understand why people are so keen on defending these things.

> array functions have the same parameter order and string functions have theirs

Except when they have different order :)

  array_filter(array $array, ?callable $callback = null, int $mode = 0): array
  array_map(?callable $callback, array $array, array ...$arrays): array

I think you need cookie banner only if you use non-essential cookies. For example if you use cookies only for user auth, you don't need to display any notification about that.