385 karma · joined April 18, 2017
First of all, congratulations on shipping a decent, polished Android app! These increasingly seem to be a rarity these days.
Regarding the subscription model, the monthly price quickly adds up, especially for users outside the US. For example, one of the most common apps in my country offers a pro subscription for a yearly price of $3, compared to a minimum of $24 ($2 * 12) in GitJournal (and this would be on top of whatever I'm paying for my desktop note-keeping app...). I would suggest that you review the pricing for low income countries (especially since the regionalized "go pro" slider UI seems glitchy, eg. I can't reselect the default price, can't select values to the right). A lower yearly subscription or a single purchase option would go a long way towards convincing me to upgrade.
I think not including ads was an excellent choice and I probably wouldn't have continued using the app with them. I was going to suggest hiding the locked pro features to make them less annoying, but upon review it's not that bad.
I'll keep using the app and leave a review on the store later when I gather more thoughts.
[1] https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.gitjournal....
In addition, I really, really wish more JS developers actually cared to learn about optimization and about how the runtime/hardware actually works. We've "developed" the web to such a slow, buggy mess that I've given up on the idea that there's any way to fix it. I hope somebody figures out a way to start over, preferably with no scripting capability, because apparently giving people any half-baked scripting language results in them soon developing nuclear footguns with it.
Random numbers picked by humans are notoriously biased. I'm guessing it's even worse when you ask them to come up with random words.
Obviously, it would be nice to follow this up with refactoring, but you could also spend this time on another project, of which the author has many (and likely thanks to this "fire and forget" attitude).
That doesn't sound anything like the priorities of a competent CEO. I think you're missing my point, too.
Normality is a broad but pretty well-researched subject and i think it's safe to say, belief in horoscopes and other unsubstantiated supernatural phenomena ain't it.