[1] http://www.inspirationandchai.com/Regrets-of-the-Dying.html
162 karma · joined December 2, 2011
[1] http://www.inspirationandchai.com/Regrets-of-the-Dying.html
Anyone want to bet on the over/under for when HBO Go/Showtime Go will appear? I imagine it will be a bit of a shot across the bow to the traditional cable providers.
I hope papers start providing full 'Credits' to what goes into a piece so as to better inform the reader how many people in the chain it takes to arrive at the final copy.
edit: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Marketplace/Mozillian_Preview#Unins...
Pick Scala if:
-You find value in strong static assurances.
-You find value in generics.
-You want to learn functional programming, not 'functional' programming (and you should).
-You value succinctness.
Pick Go if: -Compile times matter (of course it does).
-You find value in easier deployments (at the cost of potentially more deployments).
-You don't want to learn D ;)Let's say that we are running a server on a port which uses this option to allow multiple processes to bind to it. What's to prevent a rogue process, perhaps with malicious intent, from starting up and siphoning off requests willy nilly? Sounds like a great way to implement a hard to detect MITM attack.
What would be nicer, I think, is if socket reusing was bound not only to the same uid but also to the process listening to it.
I've found it to be a real productivity booster and figured it to be worth sharing considering previous discussions of hacking directory traversal.
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/when-t...
Now flexibility certainly comes with a cost: there's just that much more you need to understand about theory and architecture to be able to account for all the different code permutations. That said, it also allows for those who dedicate themselves to programming as a science to write exceptionally and more productively.
I would say Go raises the average productivity compared to more complex languages but dramatically caps the upper bound as well. Whether that's good or bad is as much philosophical as practical.