An Ode to Computer Shopper
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
There were also articles, every now and then something interesting like reviews of early PC UNIXen, scattered in with hardware roundups that often took the form of "200 laser printers!" each with a 1 paragraph blurb.
If you were the sort of teenager who was saving up for a computer to take to college - as I was - it provided endless opportunity to re-enter prices on spreadsheets while sighing over the latest unaffordable super-PC sporting a brand-new 80486DX-33 and 2 full megabytes of RAM.
(There, I think I made enough "old person" references.)
Making prank calls from your neighbor's phone line with a beige box, wishing you had the money for a laptop with a built-in modem so you can use their line to dial up to NetZero and telnet to some stuff.
My school was on BITNET, which really...bit. Laptops still required mains power supply. They were just portable. :-)
I'm going to hang a bloody onion on my damned belt now.
[1] I'm joking. They're different things.
Someone clearly has never opened up a Vanity Fair in his entire life.
I fondly remember going over each page of Computer Shopper before going to the Computer Fair to price out a new 486. But I also remember subscribing to VF so I could get my Christopher Hitchens fix.
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/when-t...
Frankly, I owe a lot of my knowledge and interest to that mag.
But what I miss is the openness. I've got the databook from Western Digital that let me write a BIOS for CP/M for the Cromemco series machines, it told me everything I needed to know to exercise every feature of their chip. Today, due to a combination of licensing and just sheer complexity issues such data sheets have largely faded away. I've been playing around with some of the ST Micro ARM chips and to really "get" them you have to have the ST Micro Data sheet, the ARM Cortex-Mx TRM, and the ARM7-M TRM. That is a ton of information about a chip with millions of transistors. Its just hard to put all of that into an accessible space. Even the lowly Microchip PIC or ATmega parts have fairly large datasheets associated with them compared to say the Z80 data sheet.
The most annoying though are the interconnects. You could easily get all the bus specs for the original IBM PC, but getting all the USB specs for a modern one? Harder and harder.
I really dislike the pervasive sense that I, as a developer, need to pay some tribute to the manufacturer before they will "allow" me to develop things with their product. Its not a general case thing, Atmel is pretty good about telling you anything you want to know for example, but every time I run into it, it leaves a very bad taste in my mouth.
And oh what you could do with a Z80 or a 6502, a few kilobytes of RAM and a couple support chips!