RedCrowbar

Wine supports WoW64 since recently [1]

[1] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Arch-Linux-WoW64-Wine

You can use access policies [1] to emulate temporal data. See an example in [2]

[1] https://docs.geldata.com/reference/datamodel/access_policies

[2] https://github.com/geldata/gel/issues/4228#issuecomment-1208...

Strictly speaking we charge for compute and storage. You can create variously-sized Gel instances and within those instances an arbitrary number of branches.

The paper seems to mostly focus on the quality of cardinality estimation (mostly driven by statistics) which is admittedly one of the frequent sore points in Postgres. There's been some progress in that area though (CREATE STATISTICS being a highlight).

That's already supported, you just need to set the Postgres cluster URI in the `GEL_SERVER_BACKEND_DSN` env var ([1]).

[1] https://docs.geldata.com/reference/reference/environment#gel...

You can use Docker (and Docker Compose) with Gel for local development [1], but of course you'd miss out on most management features of the CLI, because it's not built to supplant the docker/docker-compose CLI. Are there any particular issues you have currently with the Docker image approach?

[1] https://docs.geldata.com/resources/guides/deployment/docker

(article author here)

> If I use some other extension like timescale is that compatible with gel [...] Postgres is so powerful partly because of its ecosystem, so I want to know how much of that ecosystem is still useable if I’m using gel on top of Postgres

Playing nice with the ecosystem is the goal. We started off with more of a walled garden, but with 6.0 a lot of those walls came down with direct SQL support and support for standalone extensions [1]. There is a blog post coming about this specifically tomorrow (I think).

> And is there a story for replication

Replication/failover works out of the box.

> subscribing to queries for real time updates?

Working on it.

> so can I add gel to an existing Postgres instance and get the benefits of the nicer query language or does it rely on special tables?

Gel is built around its schema, so you will need to import your SQL schema. After that you can query things with EdgeQL (or SQL/ORM as before).

[1] https://github.com/geldata/gel-postgis

Gel as in gif obviously! :-)

EdgeDB is NOT an object store. It is "relational model enhanced" instead where a set is a fundamental building block [1] so not just relations are sets, but attributes can be sets also.

[1] https://www.edgedb.com/docs/edgeql/sets#ref-eql-everything-i...

If your database client is any good, it should do the retries for you. EdgeDB uses serializable isolation (as the only option), and all our bindings are coded to retry on transaction serialization errors by default.

Transaction deadlocks are another common issue that is triggered by concurrent transactions even at lower levels and should be retried also.

Yes. Apache 2.0 licensed with lots of focus on local-first development.

There is a work-in-progress query builder support for .NET: https://github.com/edgedb/edgedb-net/tree/feat/querybuilder-...

We wrote a blog post about this specifically: https://www.edgedb.com/blog/why-orms-are-slow-and-getting-sl...

> Can EdgeDB solve the problems like `soft-delete`?

Yes, with access policy rules. E.g

   global hide_deleted: bool;

   type SoftDeletable {
     deleted: bool;

     access policy hide_deleted
       allow all
       when (global hide_deleted)
       using (not .deleted);
   }

The above will effectively "hide" objects with `.deleted` set to `true` from all queries when the `hide_deleted` global is set to true.

> How about hooks, for example, I want to trigger scripts after/before a record is added to the table.

EdgeDB supports triggers: https://www.edgedb.com/docs/changelog/3_x#triggers. Future versions will add support for causing effects outside of the database, e.g. call a WebHook or some such.

The whole thing consists of these main parts:

1. SQL parser: https://github.com/edgedb/edgedb/tree/master/edb/pgsql/parse... 2. SQL transpiler: https://github.com/edgedb/edgedb/tree/master/edb/pgsql/parse... 3. Wire protocol handler: https://github.com/edgedb/edgedb/blob/master/edb/server/prot...

No plans for that yet. We feel EdgeQL is a far superior choice for the intended use case of application development.

Yes, although rewrites are fairly minimal. Mostly limited to name mangling.

Yes, we are looking into possibly supporting in-place upgrades in future releases.

Efficient transitive closure (aka link recursion) is something we plan to tackle soon (see https://github.com/edgedb/edgedb/discussions/2634 for some discussion on the topic).

Yes: https://github.com/edgedb/edgedb-go/issues/182

Feel free to jump in with suggestions, we need feedback from experienced Go devs.

EdgeDB does not use Postgres RLS, access rules are injected into every query by the query compiler instead. This side-steps the RLS gotchas and limitations (RLS does not allow aggregates in rules, EdgeDB does), but also yields somewhat better query performance.

Alas, we have to wait until CockroachDB becomes a bit more capable SQL-wise. I gave a more elaborate answer in https://github.com/edgedb/edgedb/discussions/3403.

With the addition of `GROUP` in 2.0, EdgeDB is as suitable for OLAP as vanilla Postgres is (unless you absolutely need window functions, which we don't implement yet).

EdgeDB is very particular about how the underlying data is organized, so you can't put it in front of an existing database. Importing schemas and data is another story which we're working on.

Only the query compiler is in pure Python and you only hit that once per query, as the compilation result is trivially cached. The hot path is a combination of Cython, C and Rust. We have a suite of benchmarks [1] that show relative overhead of EdgeDB compared to raw Postgres is quite low.

[1] https://github.com/edgedb/imdbench

I think the OP meant `NOT NULL` as in nullness check in queries. EdgeQL uses `exists <foo>` to check for existence of data. We have examples in the cheatsheet and elsewhere but it's probably hard to find if you're looking for "NOT NULL" specifically. We'll see about a way to improve the discoverability of this.

Yes, we'll be adding a way to choose the index type. It's even more relevant now that we've exposed range types.

You can run the server in foreground [1] with `env EDGEDB_DEBUG_EDGEQL_COMPILE_SQL_TEXT=1` and observe emitted SQL.

[1] edgedb instance start --auto-restart --foreground -I <your instance>

Postgres does have a very elaborate extension system, but it's unsuitable for something like EdgeDB, because we are fundamentally altering the database interface: EdgeQL vs SQL and a different client/server protocol.

That `sys::TransactionIsolation` doc is outdated, EdgeDB only supports the `Serializable` transaction isolation. See related discussion [1]

At this point EdgeDB supports Postgres HA passively, i.e. it will react to a failover event in your cluster via one of the documented mechanisms. Support for "active" cluster management is a planned feature too.

Finally, EdgeDB server itself is fully stateless and you can run multiple instances of it in front of the same Postgres cluster. Admittedly, we need to document this better.

[1] https://github.com/edgedb/edgedb/discussions/3466