186 karma · joined August 8, 2020
[0] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/
[1] https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/import-bookmarks-google...
These and other models IBM is working on can do basic tasks that anyone else could. But it will all fall apart the moment you add complexity to it.
It's hilarious to see how IBM struggles to stay relevant, what did that lead to? A bot that summarizes stack trace. Why is this even on the front page of HN?
IMHO, having the diversity in storage and computing would help the current tech world a lot.
Last month I was laid off among many other during this AI race. And I was given something called a score sheet to tell me why I was selected, while the performance score was maximum, I was not not "flexible" enough. The only thing I could think off is the conversation I had with my manager about the direction the company is going towards, but alas they went on a holiday after scoring me.
The companies might want smart and passionate people, but they never want smart, passionate, and honest people. If you don't have a brown tongue, you'll not survive.
There are other aspects that contribute heavily to burnout and employee morale, the elephant in the room is the massive layoffs and the lack of promotions[0]. Consulting firms are affected by this a lot.
If you cut down most of your workforce, or give no “rewards” for the ones who worked their ass off your revenue, of course there will be burn out, depression, and all other things that would make one stop working.
[0] https://www.ft.com/content/8c3679c4-b34a-41d0-93c9-af96ea6f9... (I couldn't get this archived).
It is “WHO Member States agree to resume negotiations aimed at finalizing the world’s first pandemic agreement.”
This is false, I had a look, if you are talking about the sites you linked in your Keybase profile, I found that you are using prefers-color-scheme to decide what colors the visitor should see if they have dark mode. This is exactly I'm asking others to implement.
@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark) {
body {
color:#fff;
background:#000
}
a:link {
color:#cdf
}
a:hover,
a:visited:hover {
color:#def
}
a:visited {
color:#dcf
}
}
If you didn't know that you had this, then you might be using a CSS framework without actually understanding what it does.No further comments by me will be added here.
Edit: looks like this project is already submitted to Ross Scott's forum post[1].
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AItTqnTsVjA
[1] https://www.accursedfarms.com/forums/topic/5784-the-gui-shou...
This situation is created by the web developers, doing whatever they can and however they can because even the existing standards are not really enforced, they don't even care about schematics and just use a framework that generates nested `<div>`. The texts are not readable due to the contrast difference, random styles being injected dynamically via JavaScript, etc.
For 2 - I would say that something is better than nothing. Why not provide a slightly better experience for the minority than providing nothing at all? I don't see the argument here, internet stranger.
If the theme preference needs to align with the entire system theme, feel free to make a proposal in W3C, with enough traction we can make it happen.
But we do get the "prefers-color-scheme"[0] and "color-scheme"[1] CSS media features, they make it easy for everyone, the visitor can just change the OS/Browser theme and the browser tells the website about what color the visitor prefers. It's up to the developer to ignore/accept their preference.
This is an accessibility thing, many hates dark theme, and some cannot look at a bright screen for long, all sites should provide either a way to change the theme or use these CSS features.
[0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@media/pref...
[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/color-schem...
[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mstoeckl/waypipe/
[2] https://wayland.freedesktop.org/faq.html#heading_toc_j_8
> If you're interested in contributing, join our Discord server to discuss ideas with other developers.
Would be nice to have a dedicated forum (Discourse?) instead, but I get that it is too soon for this project.
And ooh, I'm at https://codingotaku.com
I do not use the TOTP feature in my password manager as feel it will defeat the purpose of 2FA (though I can split it to a new DB in KeePassXC).
For my work, the company uses a proprietary password manager, I just don't install it in any of my personal computing devices.
Also, there are some accessibility issues with the page, use one of the Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools to fix this.
For me, LinkedIn is like any other social media, "okay enough" to find people and companies, but near-impossible to land a job. It is far easier to search job elsewhere, go to the company portal, and apply job from there.
But please don't change the topic to something irrelevant.
If someone did write things purely with some algorithm, just annotate that it was not written by a human, so that people who don't want to read made-up/generated articles can just ignore it and move on.
Doing it the reverse way does not make any sense to me, it is the same as treating all articles not having "written by human" label as generated content. -- in the "law enforcement" perspective, this is "guilty until proven innocent".
What can and should be enforced is licence checks, like reusing things not in public domain should follow the license when publishing (looking at you Copilot).
I guess it is too much to ask for in the clickbait-y, monetization per-view driven internet.
[1] https://f-droid.org/en/packages/io.github.hidroh.materialist...
My guess would be the title, or the way the article was written.
IMO, the article makes valid points from both technical and privacy perspective, but it was written less like a critic and more like an attack.
People in Free software community will agree with the article as most knows about how bad a centralized proprietary program can be.
But the wordings could have been better so that it would trigger fewer people.