I also find manually testing to be tedious, so I'd rather spend that time writing code that does it for me.
179 karma · joined August 9, 2014
I also find manually testing to be tedious, so I'd rather spend that time writing code that does it for me.
The article is an expression of concern. It also cites three court cases to show that it matters.
> HTTPS doesn't hurt anything and actually has some nice side effects (it separates backups onto a separate port than the majority of your web traffic, allows for traffic shaping if you want to do it).
Wouldn't using HTTPS put it on the same port as virtually all web traffic?
> Now they're [...] removing [...], and people are still complaining?
It's different people.
> Fish leather is more ecologically sound than vegan leather alternatives because it requires less energy than the creation of vegan leather, it does not include petroleum products, and it works with the circular economy using existing waste from food fisheries to create a durable finished good. Fish leather doesn’t need the extra (chemically induced) step of removing hair that mammal leather requires, either.
It'll be interesting to see if this change is going to get rid of extension support or not. I'm a Firefox fan, but uBlock Origin is more important than the browser.
[1] http://imadefood.com/recipe/NkgHYiLPl [2] http://imadefood.com/recipe/NkgHYiLPl/herbs-and-gin
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Preferenc...
It seems to me that any information - in an encyclopedia or anywhere else - on a subtopic must assume knowledge of the parent topic.
Other gripes by the author seemed to be nitpicks about article quality, which are fair but extremely minor.
Edit: that wikipedia page makes it sound like the program it replaced was the one that prints a single file to the screen.