How is this different/better than already established bike registries?
My bikes are registered here (for free):
2,568 karma · joined March 31, 2008
My bikes are registered here (for free):
I think you mean that the "theory of evolution via natural selection" is the best model we have to explain the observed phenomena of evolution. Analogous to the Newtownian theory of gravity explaining the mechanics of observed terrestrial and celestial gravity. Gravity and evolution are simply there, how they occur requires a theoretical explanation.
At first I thought I misread this paragraph, because I'm so used to people advocating remote hires at this point. I was expecting it to say "Don’t limit your search...lots of people don't want to move here."
This is certainly in line with the doctors' claims.
Why are they drinking wine if they don't like wine? What's the context for that?
Note that I pronounce "dawn" = "don".
Also, I say crayon as "crown", which either isn't very popular, or they just chose poor colors for the heatmap.
YMMV. I was part of a "10% workforce reduction", which included no severance packages. They gave us advanced notice, but I would have preferred the cash equivalent for that time instead.
I'm sure there's a rant about at will in there somewhere...
Viewing from the lens of an another American political issue: separation of church and state, an aspect of freedom of religion. There are people in the US who strongly believe that we should have state sanctioned prayer in schools and feel this doesn't conflict with religious freedom. What they fail to take into account is that at some point their children could be in the school holding prayers for Not_Their_Religion. The point being that separation of church and state is the only policy that protects everyone's religious freedom. Analogously, you can argue that allowing all speech is the only way to protect everyone's freedom of speech.
I really am not an expert on this. This is more of a dorm-room, after-hours student discussion level of understanding on my part and likely more a cultural reflection than a strong reflection of legal foundations, etc.
I suppose in the US we are more in the all-or-nothing camp when it comes to free speech (at least idealistically).
Edit: Most people in the UK would support this action - the police are arresting people who have made hateful, racist or threatening comments. Why is that bad?
The concern is that what is perfectly fine one day (and really truly legitimate) can be "bad" the next. Better not to have a category of "bad" speech at all. Otherwise you may be at whim of political fashion.
The Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect
http://seekerblog.com/2006/01/31/the-murray-gell-mann-amnesi...
Though, if the photographer holds copyright they can still charge per digital copy (per use?) of the same photo.
---
You're missing the point. Unless they retouch the photo before every subsequent digital "reprint", there's no reason to charge per digital copy of the same photo.
The OP is saying "charge what you're going to charge, but don't keep charging for each subsequent copy".
That's only by custom. Legally the photographer holds the copyright as soon as they take the photo, but they could just as easily assign full copyright to the person hiring them as a matter of course.
Most photos of people at weddings, family portraits, etc have little commercial value, except to the people who are in the photos. So you can see how this feels like double/triple/n-times charging, as it has suddenly become a monopoly backed by federal copyright law.
I had to spell out explicitly to the photographer that I hired that only I would own the copyrights to the photos and they she could not use them on her website, etc.
This was a few years ago. I think it's more common today for people to include the digital copies in the price or sell them to you for an additional fee.
When you say science, git, and LaTeX, Linux is often the next word in the sequence...
Edit: If you log in to your account and go to account details there's a "delete your account" link at the bottom. When you click the link you get a dialogue box that says this:
We're sorry you want to go, but if you must... Deleting your account will remove all of your personal data from Mendeley Web, and limit the functionality of Mendeley Desktop. Your data is still present in Mendeley Desktop so it can be archived or exported.
If your profile is visible to search engines then Mendeley may show up in relevant search results until the search engines re-index the site (this is an ongoing process but should occur within a couple of weeks.) Until this occurs, clicking on the search result link will load a Mendeley page stating that the profile cannot be found.
I do think it's interesting to see how this will play out with people who are used to being online. My grandmother is probably able to function online at the level she does because started on AOL 15+ years ago. Of course she still uses an AOL email address. So in someways she's ahead of the tech curve, but in others, she's quite behind. I'm sure this will be much the same story when we are that age.
Their white paper seems to address some issues such as proof-of-work, spam, and scalability (you'd likely have a much larger blockchain than with bitcoin).
I remember a proposal from a while ago by someone else that was essentially a PGP-encrypted RSS scheme. You encrypted each message for the intended recipient and recipients would subscribe (or choose not to) to a sender's feed.
Bitmessage seems to have the advantage of being peer-to-peer, so RSS broadcast is not an issue.
The short answer is yes, assault rifles are on a separate registry, but NY states appears to essentially ban both assault rifles and assault weapons.