Q6T46nT668w6i3m

It’s strange they are all engineering problems.

I don’t see a problem. It appears to use a shared latent to learn inverse dynamics.

There’s tons of Metal updates that will be announced during the platform meeting and workshops.

Bots are a major problem on Discord. I frequently receive messages to buy MMO gold.

On balance, there’s far more evidence to support the conclusion that language models have reached a plateau.

We have different experiences. Often I’ll see Claude, et. al. find creative ways to fulfill the task without satisfying my intent, e.g., changing the implementation plan I specifically asked for, changing tolerances or even tests, and frequently disabling tests.

It’s wild that programmers are willing to accept less determinism.

That’s an incredible idea and I hope you do this! If you do, you should consider adding restaurants too.

Slang is a fantastic developer experience.

But they still rely on fixed functions for a handful of essential ops (e.g., intersection).

I guess it depends on your definition of proof but I’d say the reasoning and justifications sections of a TOMS article qualifies and that’s a standard nearly every popular library meets.

You’re not kidding. I just looked. There isn’t anything novel in that section. I assumed from the description they found novel methods but this is standard GPU Gems advice.

Madden and NBA2K

Yeah. It’s an erosion of rights that doesn’t solve the problem. You only need one cheater to make a game feel bad and DMA devices or pixel tracking can’t be stopped with these anti-cheats.

I was in a similar situation and ended up buying a PS5. It ended up being exactly what I wanted.

Masked token prediction is reconstruction. It goes far beyond “quoting.”

I don’t follow. You’re punishing the publishing industry by punishing authors?

You’re willing to eliminate the entire concept of intellectual property for a possibility something might be a technological advancement? If creators are the reason you believe this advancement can be achieved, are you willing to provide them the majority of the profits?

“The content industries.”

Why would people invest in destroying what they love?

It’s unsound but, thankfully, there’re many sound geometric algebra libraries,

It’s slop

Everyone I know at Meta uses a Mac

The tinygrad folks talk too much

Because they make less.

Yeah! Lauren is the best.

LAPACK and OpenBLAS regularly release new versions

Evidence suggests we’re data rather than compute scarce. Nowadays models are trained using other models and we’ve started to see domain collapse.

None of these are related to what the OP is about, scientists communicating with other scientists.

Twitter played a major role in internal scientific communication for several years (for better or worse).

What do you mean? Activism is an essential part of science but maybe I’m misunderstanding your use of “activist.”