Currently, it is not (C++, mostly C style). As far as I can remember, Bill has previously said that a self-hosted version of the compiler might be a possibility, _after_ the 1.0 release and when the full spec of the language has been written.
177 karma · joined August 7, 2018
Currently, it is not (C++, mostly C style). As far as I can remember, Bill has previously said that a self-hosted version of the compiler might be a possibility, _after_ the 1.0 release and when the full spec of the language has been written.
But seriously, I don't know how much I'd trust society to care / keep funding such schools, or people working there to that with enough empathy and motivation for too long.
The sentiment that (even low-level) criminals in prison are trash, that deserves the worst instead of rehabilitation, is I feel too wide-spread for me to think it would be different.
But yeah, I might be too cynical here.
A fraudulent claimant like this is often some anonymous operation that can pop up under a different name the next day. Good luck finding them (and hope they are even located in a place where suing for copyright would even make sense).
Youtube is protected by their terms and the DCMA, as far as I know.
Because they are not allowed to sell the game cheaper elsewhere if they also want to sell on Steam. Their dev ToS require that.
Your argument sounds tautological.
I'd say in terms of value to the platform they got a great deal.
In a previous thread [2], Oskar Stålberg, creator of the games Bad North, Townscaper, is talking about his use of grids and their dual for procedural tile placement.
Franekk, an amazing pixel artist, is reacting to this that hex-grids are difficult for pixel-art, and later figures out that Oskars trick does indeed work for pixel-art too [3].
[1]: https://twitter.com/Franrekk/status/1485669221711425544 [2]: https://twitter.com/OskSta/status/1448248658865049605 [3]: https://twitter.com/Franrekk/status/1486045914930233351
I don't see how that invalidates the copyright/license argument. So, instead of just a straight up license violation it's a license violation via plagiarism.
That argument wouldn't hold up even if it was a human that caused the violation. You can't just paraphrase someones licensed work and then lie about looking at and pretend you made it yourself, which is basically what seems to happen with co-pilot, as it doesn't also automatically reproduce the license of the code it reproduces.
Crime Pays But Botany Doesn't: https://youtube.com/c/CrimePaysButBotanyDoesnt
A foulmouthed, self-taught botanist walking through deserts: urban, sub-urban and actual; talking about the origins and habitats of plants he encounters, while slagging off shitty city planning, dying lawns and ocasionally, Wholefoods.