Then why the fuck do you let them reach the top of HN and do nothing about them?
314 karma · joined August 10, 2016
This site is a trash heap of manchildren and awful moderators.
Then why the fuck do you let them reach the top of HN and do nothing about them?
Jesus fucking christ. Just fucking delete my account, you people are fucking despicable.
I chose to stop responding before it became a flame war, I have no idea why you would go through this thread, and downvote and flag both of us. What are you talking about?
But it isn't just SD, it's hundreds, if not thousands of jurisdictions. One person doesn't have that kind of time.
So yeah, everything you disagree with doesn't count. Thanks for wasting my time.
Watch this:
Our economy depends on """illegal""" immigrants in order to survive things like harvest season.
What's alleged is whether or not the shootings were legal. It isn't a point of view that those men are dead because of a cop.
EDIT: Downvoted for stating a fact.
No, nobody has given you a position you agree with. You can't just say "EVERYTHING I DISAGREE WITH IS INDEFENSIBLE HURR DURR", that's not how things work.
Whether or not you agree is irrelevant, but you clearly can't see that, so arguing with you is just a waste of time.
Grow up.
All in all this is a cool concept, but I don't think it will be executed well. What happens when my "window" inevitably breaks (as technology is apt to do) and the illusion of being able to see is broken? What about annoying dead pixels or color banding? I can't imagine the displays being used are very high quality.
There are a number of sources, all of them biased, so I'd prefer not to link any.
How does something like regular desktop development have any more barriers? I picked up Python at 14 and that had absolutely no barriers for entry other than installing IDLE on a laptop. If anything, webdev has more barriers for entry because you need a webserver and a backend of some kind.
Crypto is meaningless, stock is actually owning part of a company.
Why would FiveFilters falsely defend Media Lens - a conservative organization - while attacking a wiki editor who is extremely pro-war? Your argument really only makes sense if the editor is liberal and attacking Media Lens and FiveFilters.
That's pretty much already happened. Remember that time Scientology tried to attack Wikipedia for telling the truth about Sea Org? They got close to getting away with it, and if a larger nation-state tried editing less-controversial articles, I'm sure they would get away with it. It wouldn't surprise me if Russia has already done things like that.