It is pretty cool, we use it for detection of humidity degree or for species discrimination (e.g. plants, minerals, chemicals…).
111 karma · joined July 8, 2021
It is pretty cool, we use it for detection of humidity degree or for species discrimination (e.g. plants, minerals, chemicals…).
But still, I wondering if this should mean that WFH needs to be enforced at any company. Not every company can implement full WFH without disrupting operations, especially when working with hardware or when needing concurrent comunication between co-workers.
The article about black workers, mentions discrimination based (mainly) on their appareance. Sure this cannot happen if they work behind a screen. But the same would happen if we all were blind? Shall we wear opaque glasses to end discrimination based on racial features too?
We can also flip the argument. I see this as telling black people (or other groups), stay at home, and in this people will not discriminate you. Is this really what we want? We should make the world better by improving it, not downgrading it.
By this reasoning, we should also close all physical stores, since wheelchair users have more difficulties to buy bread in person. If for the majority it is easier to go in person to buy bread, I think a better compromise is to adapt the shop to as many people as possible, while accepting that access will be still more difficult for some.
I linked the original study, but I saw it Spanish national media, and then here: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/19/health/bacterial-antimicr...
There are physical limits that forces them to have big mirrors and other expensive and relatively bulky optical elements. Also, there is no mass production due to small batch sizes (typically one or two).
So if they have a two year life span, it will not be economically viable.
For additional background, there are already optical interferometry telescopes in use, see VLTI by the European Southern Observatory (Chile, shared facility with the four VLT telescopes and some smaller telescopes).