P0l83q4p1Hw3Ul

I meant Foone Turing specifically.

No comment on the correlation between mental illness and trans.

I've found it's too easy to re-enable the home page, so I also deleted and disabled watch history. This makes the recommendation system much less effective.

For WFH, you can work 2 jobs for 2 weeks.

Or try out having 2 jobs for a week before deciding if you want to put in a 2 week notice at your old job, quit the new job, or continue working at both.

So they can see I have a phone and a computer?

What information can be pulled from home network just by being connected?

Why should I care (not addressed by the article or any comments so far)?

The idea is to keep the relationship manager a secret.

It seems they succeeded in the challenge to steal the car.

People with bipolar disorder aren't capable of making rational decisions?

And Elon is just a completely normal guy?

An app with millions of users, that everyone in this thread knows about, is worth $0?

Is Elon Musk being scammed by Twitter?

Same situation.

Can't a rich dude buy a company without goofy rumors being spread (scammed into buying Parler)?

Having a celebrity owner increases the value.

Why not $965B?

What did you learn about E-pimps? What does history tell us?

I appreciate the effort to analysis my comment, but it seems you misinterpreted, so I'll explain my comment.

One could argue that a democracy by definition must have free speech. Otherwise, it's more of a "vote on the options provided by the ruling class". My question was meant as an actual question, is the illusion of democracy better than democracy for survival?

I use the word survival because it's the first law of life.

I use "right wing extremists" to make fun of people who think free speech is a right wing idea, or that opposing low-iq immigration is extreme.

I didn't mention political parties, nor mean to imply anything.

Hence why certain people are trying to lower the IQ as quickly as possible.

Yes. Just look at the "words are violence" alphabet people.

Is Freedom of Speech important for a democratic society to survive?

Right wing extremists would say yes. In fact, this is why they believe we shouldn't allow low cognitive ability immigrants into the country or let them vote.

I'd consider her equal in relevance to Kim Kardashian.

For some quality entertainment, read through the comments pretending they're talking about Kim Kardashian.

"I've never considered myself a ['celebrity worshipper'] but... I just burst into tears unexpectedly [upon hearing of Kim's death]."

There's this strange thing where people can't admit that suicide can sometimes be a rational choice, good for the person and/or society.

Not sure if this delusion is a net benefit, but it would be interesting to see someone attempt to be a pragmatist for such an emotional topic.

Why not just retire?

Stop noticing patterns!

-Joking

I avoid companies that don't have live chat (text) support.

With live chat, if the person sounds dumb or unable to fix my issue, I just ask to talk to a human.

Accent != race.

So you're the racist for assuming you can identify someone's race by their accent.

And the law is racist because it impacts different races differently.

This is supposed to sound really stupid, but I'm not sure if you would catch on to that or actually agree.

I think you've just explained why stereotypes, prejudice, and racism aren't issues.

People notice patterns that are true often enough that they decide to avoid certain people. Saving time on customer support, reducing odds of being the victim of a crime, etc.

It's only an issue when people use too low of a threshold for numbers of experiences or percent of experiences.

I currently work for Youtube. We identify conspiracy-seeking queries, and then boost results from authoritative sources. Don't see why we wouldn't also be doing this on Google. Maybe people don't bother searching for things when the results suck (or maybe they just use alternative means of searching)?

Why not just kill patent trolls? That should solve this problem real quick.

To be clear I've never heard of HJTA.

Letting schools continue to suck with the excuse that they just need more funding is the sickening anti-education policy.

Yes, an organization that is shitty due to bad policies won't improve, and might become worse, when given more funding.

I don't see how that subtracts from the value of the claims that can be verified, just ignore biased claims like any other media.

I'm not familiar with the idea that it's bad for white people to want a good future for their children? Seems quite racist to me.

I like your explanation, but it seems you're arguing in favor of reading "The American Truth", since it will give you both perspectives if you're currently only reading blue-supremacist newspapers?

And you'll be fine as long as you recognize the biases on both sides and verify claims.