Onplana

Access your project online real estate for free.

I like to listen instead of reading books.

Most of the cameras are showing offline.

Check a free tool to see migration preview here. https://onplana.com/tools/migration-preview

Onplana is an alternative to Project online.

The question is which category of justice does it qualify?

I was expecting a demo on the linked page itself. Interesting to let Codex or Claude Code do it :)

Is it about funds? Why Github is not catching up with the traffic? I know there's a mass rush on Github recently specially due to Claude Code leading users to use Github. sometimes even persuasive.

Going to try it. just downloaded. will see how it is compared to Claude Code

If they tighten up things, it would impact the ease of use.

A pattern that's gotten worse in the last year or so: drive-by PRs from third-party "security scanners" trying to plant their badge in your README. Got one last week — single-line diff adding a markdown image link back to their scanning service, with a body formatted as a "94/100 Verified Safe" audit report. The "high severity finding" they flagged turned out to be the section of our README explaining how we defend against prompt injection. They were scoring legitimate documentation as a vulnerability so the report would look thorough.

The economics make sense if you squint: each accepted PR is a permanent backlink on a real OSS repo, and most maintainers don't have time to review carefully. Close one, see five more.

Combined with the Dependabot avalanche (a small repo I check in on has 15+ open dep bumps, half with stale merge conflicts because they touch the same workflow file), the modern maintainer tax isn't writing code — it's triaging bots and growth-hackers who treat your contribution policy as an SEO funnel.

Zero-dep philosophy doesn't fully escape this; the PRs come for your README badges and your transitive scanners regardless.