Nicotine is not a "controlled substance".
627 karma · joined January 18, 2020
Nicotine is not a "controlled substance".
Not sure why they're so different but I don't think it's the cash-only property that is doing it, since it's the same deal in OR.
Students probably shouldn't be falling hard on one side or the other any earlier than they already do lest even more of them believe they are completely unrelated.
I don't think copyright needs to do double duty as life insurance and it is mostly not helpless widows that are benefitting from it.
It's still hard to beat paper for these types of applications.
Is it the same everywhere? No, but it is similar in a lot of places, due to political agreements and convergence.
Disney would be a more likely, though still unlikely, lightning rod for apparently having sold their streaming service as a "loss leader" and having purchased lots and lots of copyrights and trademarks which they subsequently made exclusive, directly causing the termination of Netflix programs in some cases.
So I think we've made progress...
Getting a new pair of glasses was an unreasonably rare and precious thing when I was growing up, because of the cost.
*in general, optometrists must produce a copy of the prescription that was paid for when asked, and then you can take it wherever. Make sure they write down your pupillary distance on it; they often "forget" to do this.
If, say, a courthouse has a statue of a religious theme, then by the law of the land, the courthouse must be willing to erect a statue for any religion. Like, say, a statue of Baphomet. Or they can remove _all_ of the religious iconography. That demographics are mostly Christian and so such things are overtly offensive makes it more effective.
So, atheists or agnostics or even people of more orthodox religious persuasion are using the Church of Satan as a vehicle of representation for a strong stance on the separation of church and state.
There has been and continues to be a lot of research behind that cope. The effortless mastery over e..g. phonology that children emerge with is very difficult to replicate in adulthood, even after decades of speaking.
The client is buggy and slow.
It makes the terrible, lazy choice of blanking the window when it has a connectivity problem.
Non-standard for-pay emojis are a terrible idea. Text should be copyable, by everyone, exactly as it is.
It's not the worst among the current stable of chat solutions. I would give that award to Teams, because wow, Teams fails in just about every way, it's a spectacle really.
Each day, I am a bit surprised at how all of the major platforms fall short of expectations, because superficially it seems like a pretty tractable problem space.