Navarr

I was already livid about this change but this is the piece de resistance. Holy hell. Even after migrating to a regular Google account I've still been using my custom domain as my identity.

Same thing here. Within the past two years I started a transition to a regular Google Account b/c GApps Free was a second class citizen (no family groups, etc.)

Killing the free tier now is a huge PITA, and especially aggravating without them implementing any way to carry over licenses to a regular google account which is still free.

I suppose if you took Nakamoto's coins, you'd either get away with it or learn who Nakamoto is REAL quick

Could incentivize instead of force; I don't think that's causing any harm - right?

I think for a long time the only thing that will push IPv6 uptake will be legislation.

ISPs don't want to implement it because their customers aren't pushing them to, because websites aren't typically IPv6-only, because that's a terrible business model.

So unless we force or incentivize ISPs to implement IPv6 access through law, it's going to be a long time before we hit the breaking point where something HAS to be done by ISPs

When you click the box it seems like it applies only to iPhones

The "Semantic Web" is crying about having its Web 3.0 moniker stolen by blockchain

Per-server* and only if that server has it turned on. Servers can disable the ability for users to change their name

Capital One was an online-only bank before online-only banks were a big thing. It started as "ING Direct" before the sale to Capital One.

I've definitely had some issues with customer service (not refunding a fee they said they were going to), but it's nice to have a "bank" with custom support

I've got just enough imagination to convert the black to void so it's a very helpful picture, thanks!

Why do you think that breaking Google apart would make the portions that don't directly receive money from advertisements less likely to sell ad space?

I would love to see a picture of this

I'm actually kind of surprised that this hasn't happened yet, with the security concerns around how capacitive portals work.

I'm not super familiar with how the Wi-Fi connection process works, but I would expect that a URL for a capacitive portal could be provided during the connection handshake

Yeah, it's pretty clear the fine is about not obeying the court.

But I was asking why the court was forcing them to re-instate a video in the first place.

What's the law they ran afoul of here?

I'm getting the impression from the Google Translate'd version of this[1] article, that they violated a contract with the company?

[1]: https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article232421961/OLG...

Discord, too.

Yeah this is very clearly on the ad-blocker.

I think TeeSpring has the right idea - they're checking that GA is loaded, if it is, then do stuff with it, if it's not, then don't.

I don't understand how a website can and should be expected to adapt to a browser plugin changing the APIs they depend on out from underneath them.

What were the charges for?

Could you imagine living with your spouse who owns the account on their email; your spouse is at work or on a business trip - maybe even out of the country, and you get this screen (or maybe you are!)

Authorized Devices with a limit is a better choice

Would be nice if it threw in a "how far up the wall should this be" number

Lack of laws, and that literally nobody wants to have to legally verify their age to use a random website.

The "Fuck you, pay me" license.

FYPML.

Figuring out the right terms would be difficult, but not impossible.

It is running "Google TV," but "Google TV" runs on the "Android TV" operating system variant of "Android"

For Android, a launcher is a special type of application that is in charge of launching other applications.

If you search for "popular launchers" you should be able to find some examples

Google TV is a launcher for Android TV, so far as I can tell. Android TV is not being rebranded, as it is the OS - but Google TV is the "Google Experience" on Android TV.

To make this more complicated/interesting - Google renamed the Play Movies and TV app to "Google TV." I'm guessing so you can have Google TV on Google TV?

Will the Play Movies app on my existing Android TV open the Google TV launcher like shown off here, or is it still just a browser for the content I already have?

Is the change to Android TV just that this app becomes the launcher?

I wonder if this wasn't done previously so that when a file is shared, if it is trashed, the person it was shared with still has access to it?

Once you've signed in, they offer this video: https://youtu.be/tedTuOvS8Dw

sunk cost fallacy. If you have an iPhone you're probably deep into the Apple ecosystem and migrating to another platform is painful.

It doesn't matter.

The burden of truth is supposed to be on the accuser.

Consider if you will - a robber is caught by police in his own house. In this house, they found the items the robber stole. Should they:

a) take the items the robber stole b) take everything