44 karma · joined March 9, 2019
I've disabled auto upgrading for apt too. I prefer doing it manually when I need / have time for it.
> Do you have a solution for updating AppImages?
Bash.
Until they realize that users prefer not to use Ubuntu because of snap.
I think snaps future is the same as Upstart, Unity etc.
It's not activity itself but what app does in background in reaction to incoming packets. Clients I used (Bombus and Xabber) didn't support that XEP with no problem. App may just ignore some stanzas when not needed.
What about centralization into entities with massive CPU clusters?
If by "push" you mean sending notifications through 3rd party servers like google's Firebase, I'd like not to use it.
I was using XMPP on mobile for years, receiving messages in background normal way almost with no battery drain.
I also run k9mail 24/7 with my personal IMAP server, receiving messages in realtime (imap idle) with almost no battery waste.
Battery is wasted more by bloated frameworks like Electron rather than by network activity itself.
Putin isn't the first ever russian leader and is not last. Next leader may be Ramzan Kadyrov, for example.
PHP's base_convert() equivalent.
Actually there are some forks (Waterfox, Librewolf, Torfox, etc.), but they are focused on removing anti-features rather than on developing.
What if he is? Are you nazi?
> Try this on for size: “Why is <insert-your-country-name> such an economic failure?”
Which one? Poland, Romania or Turkey aren't failure.
But Navalny isn't "their own system". Vast majority of russians heard of him but he has done nothing useful. All his activity is just self-promoting. By the way, in the past there was a figure with similar views: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduard_Limonov
No, it's you.
https://www.france24.com/en/20180920-ukraine-region-ban-russ... https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/04/25/ukraine-passes-l...
Basically this is why Crimea doesn't want to be part of Ukraine anymore. And other regions may follow this way.
> Crimea has been invaded by Russian special forces and annexed by Russia, there is no ambiguity here.
You forgot to ask crimeans whether they were invaded.
Even chechens don't claim that they are invaded, despite there was real war there, unlike in Crimea.
> Your comparison with Texas is non-sensical.
You forgot to ask Chuck Norris. https://old.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/83ln5/chuck_norri...
Your claim Ukraine been invaded by USSR is too. Ukraine have signed official agreement to be part of USSR.
> does not justify Russian invading the country.
It's better if such unstable "countries" like Ukraine, Chechnya, e.t.c. to be controlled by a strong country like Russia, USA, China, e.t.c. Letting them do whatever they want threatens the security of Europe. And it's better if Russia invades Ukraine than if somebody like ISIS takes control over them.
Yeah, hybrid war.