Narkov

For context, their total city revenue for FY22 is $1.8b. Not passing judgement either way, but at what point should this be reportable?

He will almost certainly collect none of it which makes the process largely useless unfortunately. These are shell companies that will never pay up.

> The wind fields around fires are not unpredictable.

They are on a drone scale (the purpose of my comment) and you've acknowledged this yourself:

> but also can have significant eddies induced by the fire, landscape, and vegetation. This would make it very difficult for a drone to remain stable and on course, let along drop ordinance with any accuracy.

> - The airspace around a bush fire is a particularly hostile environment.

This is a good point. Bushfires are also largely caused by high winds that are unpredictable. It makes drones carrying heavy fire retarding payloads a very difficult proposition.

> equipment isn't catching up to IPv6

<citation required>

It's not equipment...it's purely a financial business decision that this hasn't happened yet.

^ this. You need to have a high WAF - wife acceptance factor. Another analogy is that grandma needs to be able to stay in the house and not need a computer science degree.

Your home automation system is a complimentary enhancement to a traditional, switch-on-the-wall and physical TV remote control set up.

I would have thought it is a dying market. Sample size of one but I probably print 10 pages a year now.

If that freaks you out, what until you hear about tech start-ups these days!!

Forget flashing lights. Why would the car not stop or even slow down when a large immovable object is within impact distance? Auto-brake has been around for a decade now.

> You were part of the lucky 1% who make it through the program from application to funding,congrats!

People aren't selected at random. There isn't any luck involved. It's hard work.

I feel it's diminishing peoples achievements to say that their lotto numbers came up and YC let them in.

> This seems like a tactic to bring in more money

This is every business decision!

It's great that Toyota has measured the improvement in customer trust or loyalty being more valuable to them in the long run than shirking on quality.

I only wish more companies would do this!

It's always DNS!

It's always DNS!

FinTech doesn't always mean global mega bank. There's lots of small scale start-ups that fit into the financial services category that wouldn't/couldn't afford full time InfoSec roles.

Outsourced CISO/InfoSec is a valid and reasonable thing for some companies.

With net assets increasing at a similar rate, I don't see this as a problem.

It's always DNS!

Worse off. Feeding their family is probably a higher priority than a shitty job.

It doesn't change the fact that the job is rubbish.

I don't know you circumstances but it is possible to still do something out of desperation - possibly to feed your family - and hate it.

> Imagine if a company the size of Amazon had a breach?

Is it hard to imagine? Does it really matter anymore? There are [non-Amazon] breaches every few years with 100m+ records.

It will happen and people will be shocked and outraged and then it will happen again. Wash, rinse, repeat.

Nit pick...but in a binary decision (yes/no), the margin is only 9% as every loss on one side is a gain on the other.

For example, a 9% swing results in a tie.

> A reason very simple, you don't want a short through the clock to set your space, or aircraft on fire!

Why not use a simple fuse?

> Thanks to a student from Boston University who came up with some pretty cool techniques, we can cover devices effectively without having to teach the fuzzer about each device's registers.

Can I ask who this was and is there any more info on their work? Seems important and worth naming them :)

Of course sovereignty and overall data security should be considered. My point is that a blanket "no outsourcing" rule is daft and counterproductive.

Increasing the sample rate will still reduce the noise.

This is an inefficient use of government money to in-source everything. If private industry can do something cheaper and more effective, use common sense.

I would assume the administrator cares enough about their own data to want to do it properly.

With no segregation, you crack one service you get access to all 25 services and their data.

With segregation, you crack one service you get access to just that container/physical service.

Sounds like a dream to compromise! Rather than one attack surface, there's like 25. Crack one and you take the lot.

Bought! Too cheap though...double, or even triple the price.

Got a link for the USB oscilloscope?