599 karma · joined September 4, 2011
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/global-infrastructure/gove...
CISA also doesn't have authority over DoD or IC systems, let alone the aforementioned budgetary authority to make them do it. No, it doesn't make any sense to apply a lesser standard to systems that are more sensitive. Like I said, government-grade security.
My personal systems aren't where they should be for CM, but I still can't think of a good reason to update in place rather than rebuild and copy over configuration/data.
Flavors should make it easier to operate with packages instead of ports, but I don't have any idea what's going on there. If I were supporting a large number of systems, I'd want FreeBSD over Linux any day of the week and twice on Sundays because the ports system doesn't make you choose between a stable OS branch and current software.
It's possible one of Scott Adams's moles was at this meeting, since they seem to be omnipresent and omniscient.
The federal government has an annoying habit of preferring contractors for technical work, both because it's easier than directly paying people what they're worth and because it allows them to claim that the government is smaller than it actually is. Nonetheless, there are pockets of good technical jobs: CIA DS&T; NSA (RF, signals analysis, cryptanalysis); DHS (CISA). You won't be laid off, and there's lots of interesting and useful work; but even if you don't want to go contractor you're likely to run away from the HR departments that seem to view their job as preventing everyone else from doing theirs or the lack of external training opportunities, and at least in the intelligence community agencies are as headquarters-centric as Google and Facebook were ten years ago.
The risk of contracting can vary wildly. Some contracts have a new prime every five years; some go fifty years or more without a changeover. There are definitely contractors and contracts that are low risk, but in general the same rules apply as in SV: stability is being able to find another job, not a guarantee of continuing the same one.
[1]: In the MIT sense.
[2]: Spoiler: if you have a high enough GPA to convince Bloomberg that you'd be a good tool, you can get into a T14 law school.
(archive.org link because ibm.com apparently isn't hosted on a mainframe.)
Ten years ago there were quite a few post offices open 24/7/365. Today the 24-hour locations are at best 18/7 and the more usual hours are better than traditional banker's but worse than retail M-F, limited on Saturday, and LOLGFY on Sunday. Which limits their revenue to whatever services they have a legal monopoly on, plus package services for businesses where the shipper wasn't going to the post office to mail things anyhow.
Assuming the warehouse worker can afford all that, someone offering anti-tamper-bypass-as-a-service is going to run headfirst into the FBI, SCA, and other well-resourced government organizations with which a sane individual would never consider fucking. That does not lead to rising property values in Tokyo.