1,257 karma · joined May 22, 2010
This determination to have the complete, closed story, or model, the final word, is something I cannot forgive Marx for. It proved, after all, responsible for a great deal of error and, more significantly, authoritarianism. Errors and authoritarianism that are largely responsible for the left’s current impotence as a force of good and as a check on the abuses of reason and liberty that the neoliberal crew are overseeing today.
If I were an NSA shill I'd just mention something about Snowden harming the US or Snowden being a spy. It's a controversial and dumb argument so it's going to get a decent amount of replies. It also doesn't take much effort. You'd derail the conversation, and informative comments would be drowned out by a bunch of people arguing whether Snowden is a hero or traitor.
So try eating the same amount of calories as you do now, but in a smaller time window and you might lose weight.
Here's your answer.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/07/us/politics/foreign-powers...
As for the question of Turkey being a valid target, let me remind you that several people in the Turkish government were planning a false flag operation in order to invade Syria.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/28/world/europe/high-level-le...
Could you elaborate? As far as I know, Germany has some kind of agreement to not spy on the US.
I wonder what would happen if they started using Monstermind-like software?
I don't think it's a conspiracy that US successfully managed to get Ukraine out of Russia's hands. A good thing, some might say.
That waste gets into the blood and probably into the brain, changing its chemistry.
If this theory is correct, does it mean that a drastic change in diet might change a person's behavior? I'm imagining a future where people match their diet to their intestinal bacteria to increase or reduce the "waste" that gets produced to achieve a desired mood or behavior.
First of all, whether they are shameless or not doesn't really matter. If sexually explicit pictures of a politician end up on the internet, his reputation takes damage. It's beyond his control. Plenty of politicians are willing to go to great lengths to avoid this. So what does it matter if he's shameless or not?
Second of all, politicians and other powerful people might have something to hide that isn't just embarrassing but is also illegal. It's certainly not beyond the capabilities of the NSA to target powerful people that oppose the NSA while ignoring those that support them.
For example, in the news you might read about a CEO that gets convicted of insider trading. Nothing to worry about, right? Well, what if the NSA purposefully targeted him because they don't like whatever it is he's doing? Using parallel construction, it wouldn't even have links to the NSA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandal...
A bit further down this thread you can see how one of his counter-arguments consisted of telling someone his Android book had terrible reviews. What's funny about this is that it fits neatly with one of JTRIG's purposes of destroying reputations.
Although he did such a hilariously bad job of trying to destroy someone's reputation, I doubt he's anything other than a troll.
But now that I think of it, he did succeed in derailing a big part of this thread, so maybe he knows what he's doing.
Pelosi added that she has always fought for checks and balances on CIA activity and its interactions with Congress: “You don’t fight it without a price because they come after you and they don’t always tell the truth."
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140317/07441526589/nancy-...
Wouldn't that give you a lot of false positives?
Perhaps you could first try finding accounts with similar writing style. Though I'm not sure about the accuracy of such algorithms.
Someone call OkCupid and notify them of this so they can start working on their next PR campaign.