813 karma · joined February 11, 2018
An LLM isn't a calculator. But we probably can teach it how to use one.
Thanks for documenting your work so well!
So your PCB layout tips are important, even on slow circuits these days.
I was introduced to the second edition (silver) when I attended college in the late 90s, and have later upgraded to the third edition (gold). It also has a companion book with more exercises and lab experiments.
For everyone that wants to learn EE, it is highly recommend. Just beware: there are fake copies for sale on Amazon, so be sure you get a genuine copy.
Minification works in the same way. A lot of information needed for understanding the code is lost. Getting back that information can be a very demanding task.
Anyway, good luck to the creator. I hope you find people interested in contributing :-)
I would gladly have done it for $100k.
It's easy to forget that the 80s took us from Apple II, TRS-80, PET, via C64, Amiga, Atari ST and Macintosh to SuperVGA and 486 when we entered the 90s.
It was a nice period in history when proper RISC was working well, when we could get stuff to run faster, but getting more transistors was expensive. Now we can't get it to run faster but we can get billions of transistors, making stuff more complicated being the way to more performance.
I wonder if we ever again will get a time where simplification is a valid option...
Nadella built new product categories for the company.
I think two more years with Ballmer would have made the the prophecy valid.
This guy actually did it. What a fun project it must have been. Super interesting read.
One detail in the introduction that made me a bit puzzled: "The Valve.Computer is an 8 bit computer, with the usual 12 bit address and data buses". In an 8 bit CPU, we had "the usual 16 bit address bus and the 8 bit address bus".
The ST became the king of MIDI.
The Amiga was the queen of gfx and video.
Machintosh created and ruled the DTP revolution.
Still, they had so much in common. If the three companies had made one OS and all standardized on the Amiga chipset, they could have won over the IBM PC.
Of course, back then, they didn't know how the PC would crush them all, at that time the three thought they were each others biggest competitors.
I think accusing AI generated work to theft, is a based on the wrong assumptions.
It's not just art. What do you do in computer science courses? Or math, language, physics, or any other subject? You study what has already been made. What you produce based on that knowledge is not considered theft.
Have you ever seen an AI image that, if a human made it, would be considered a theft?