2,639 karma · joined August 11, 2010
florian dot laurent at gmail
Having your fly open is a harmless mistake that has little impact on your peers. People may or may not mention it to you but it’s not something they’ll hold against you.
Posting LLM slop under your name is a deliberate act. You decide to damage your message by taking a shortcut.
The obvious analogy was speaking while chewing.
Can you please provide sources for this? My understanding is that he used the expression "I appreciate the pushback" in a context in which it made sense (responding to criticism), and people flagged that it sounded LLM-like.
There’s some poetry seeing people complaining about how LLM provide unreliable information in a confident tone, who then go on to share incorrect information in a confident tone.
You’re probably thinking of Meta. Google renting GPUs is a less recent phenomenon, to say the least.
> The practical lesson for defenders: have a capable model you can run on your own infrastructure vetted and ready before an incident, both to avoid guardrail lockout and to keep attacker data and credentials from leaving your environment.
This sounds like a reasonable measure. Any recommendations regarding the most suitable models for this? GLM? Kimi?
You can read plenty of details in the blog post and tech report but the TLDR is that we trained a multiplayer world model on 10k hours of Rocket League data. We optimized it to be playable at 20fps on a single GPU.
So what you see in the demo is fully generated: there’s no graphics or physics engine. Instead it’s a 5b neural network that takes actions in and gives pixels out.
Mira was trained on 10k hours of Rocket League data. The model has 5B parameters and runs 4-player games at 20 fps on a single B200 GPU.
We've released a playable online demo, an in-depth technical report as well as a 1k hour dataset of 4-players gameplay:
Technical report: https://mira-wm.com/paper Repo: https://github.com/mira-wm/mira
I feel the frustration of reading "slop", but on the other hand the projects that surface do usually bring something useful to the table.
Should we simply judge the submission based on its technical merit? Why do I feel annoyed that an otherwise cool project uses typical LLM prose? For how long will we be able to recognize LLM-generated text, and what happens when we can't?
— https://www.businessinsider.com/openai-discontinues-sora-vid...
So yeah, focusing on world models
https://duckdb.org/2024/12/06/duckdb-tpch-sf100-on-mobile#a-...
> AI tools will allow the best to reach even greater heights, while enabling smaller teams to accomplish more, and bring in some completely new creator demographics.
I have not... A video showing what it's talking about would have been a good addition to this article.
It’s honestly not the worse AI content out there! Lots of movies I wouldn’t consider watching but that I’m curious enough to see summarized (eg a movie where only the first title was good but two more were still published)
If you expect more long term support you better be paying me for my time.
Surprising to simultaneously announce the end of the road yet point to the road ahead