582 karma · joined April 5, 2019
Also, there was a similar experiment done in targeted ads on Facebook not too long ago.[1]
[0] https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/vb98pb/google-jigsaw-beca...
[1] https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-the-secret-facebook-war...
I used to be able to tell pretty easily when people were making up "an AI wrote this" stories and jokes because they were absurd but made too much sense. A context was held for too long. But this is starting to push it into the realm of possibility.
How can you combat censorship and extremist speech at the same time?
Doesn't matter anyway. My reflexes aren't what they were when I was a teenager.
It's fine if you don't get the allure of this project. But to presume to tell someone how they should spend their own time is ridiculous to me. The creator of FreeDOS set out to do something, succeeded, and enjoyed their time doing it. And this person is telling them they're wrong.
I guess the semantic web is orthogonal to this discussion. My apologies. I guess it's another buzzword that was thrown around for a time. In that case, assume I meant web components whenever I said semantic web.
That's what I meant by "the promise of the semantic web". As I originally understood it, you could make your own custom tags that describe the intent of the document. You wouldn't be bound by what the w3c or browser vendors blessed. Any tags that were unknown to the browser would be treated mostly the same as a div. Web components occupy a similar space.
I will say the music part was interesting. I could mostly make out the song on the MP3. On Opus, I could barely tell there was music there. A lot of it was just missing.