384 karma · joined September 23, 2013
I'm not even sure what that would mean practically. By brute market share, possibly not. But I've had Ubuntu as my personal daily driver for many years, and at the moment it's honestly just a much better experience than either Windows or macOS.
Microsoft and Apple seem to have turned their operating systems into advertising platforms for their other products, largely disregarding the basics of what makes a desktop actually work well.
Why should they, though? He seems to be staking much of his credibility on vague accusations that someone is not doing the work. Mostly the case seems to be that his propositions are not being ignored, they simply lack substance.
The thing is, the less evidence you have, the easier it is to come up with any number of stories that "fit" the data points. Historians therefore need to be extremely conscious about only drawing conclusions that have an undisputed record supporting them. That is the whole basis of the scientific methodology; if you can't get the evidence, you have no argument.
The period Hancock has chosen to focus on is commonly called "prehistory" for a good reason, as without any written records, there's not much of a basis to build any kind of narrative that stands up to scrutiny. Especially if you only cherry-pick data points that fit your assumptions, and wilfully ignore a gigantic void in the rest of the known record.
Surely that is a problem with the credibility of the claims themselves, and not the rest of the world.
Most often the reason is lack of evidence in proportion to the claims.
That of course being the rule of thumb, and obviously people don't necessarily build every meal to exactly that pattern. A pizza night every now and then is okay too.
> rarely have any significant nutrient deficiencies
People in the Nordics are usually already supplementing at least vitamin D due to lack of sunlight, and often iodine due to a lack of it in the soil. So in this context, switching to a combined vegan supplement that includes those as well as B12 is a relatively small change.
Basically the only exception is infant formula, unless the child has a diagnosed milk allergy. There's also a general recommendation against restricted, e.g. macrobiotic and raw diets.
Where I live, a vegan diet is recognised as part of the official dietary recommendations for children, and is provided also in schools and kindergartens: https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/en/themes/healthy-diet/nutrition...
For some definition of "motivating", probably so, but I wouldn't want to take that extra stress to keep a self-motivated minor commitment.
I haven't really seen that happen with post-1.0 Rust, which is everything onwards of early 2015. I believe they've since tightened a couple of edge cases due to soundness issues, but nothing worse than that.
Would be interesting to hear about your contrary experiences.
Maybe a more constructive way to look at this would be that people simply do "dumb" things. In customer support where you only see those moments, it might not always seem that way, but dealing with people's simple mistakes is also educating them to do better next time.
As far as I understand, that should be practically zero-cost on x86, and quite cheap also on ARM - and it's also only paid during acquisition and destruction. I haven't yet caught refcounting in profiling as being the cause of unacceptable performance.
This is an odd straw man to bring out, when the goal is very explicitly to reduce carbon output. Also nothing so far implies that the legislation is impossible to fix once the electric fleet exists.
But also, solving it the wrong way may create an opportunity to do better.
That's the key though, isn't it? While I can see that the intentions may be good, this isn't being released into a vacuum, but rather to a world where all of that other tracking infrastructure already exists.
I guess those pictures are popular because food is easy to relate to, and people build lots of social interactions around eating. Developers also relate to things about code, and like to share those relations among each other.
I feel some puzzlement about the format too, though. These days it's so easy to make text on the web look nice, and it's easily accessible, copyable and searchable.
That is true in the most literal sense, but Unity have adopted a programming model that makes much of the normal tooling around .NET useless, and abhors automated testing.
Adopting good testing practices in Unity still largely revolves around developing parts of your game as .NET libraries that get tested before being built and integrated into the game, and it's not too surprising that many developers don't go down this route.
Out of curiosity, what are those reasons?
This doesn't happen, at least on account of Snap. It's copy-on-write when it comes to updates, and whatever version you have running at the time of update will happily keep on running. I've been mildly confused by this a couple times, when I would end up with two different versions of VS Code running side by side, but the bright side was that my work wasn't interrupted.
It incidentally also sidesteps all the problems that stem from libraries or configuration being updated under a running application, which can happen with Apt.
There's also plenty of room for art in the choice of materials and colours as well as the shapes of buildings. Likewise, with code, if you limit yourself to only what one person can do, you'll end up with a very constrained view of what "art" means.