923 karma · joined August 29, 2023
This entire thread is ripe with it; hundreds of suggestions about what policy would have worked, what she SHOULD have focused on.
It doesn't matter. It's obvious when you really just embrace it: she should have lied her ass off. Blatantly. Overly simply obvious lies.
"I will fix the economy. I will triple your paycheck and lower prices at the grocery store. I will half the cost of a house. Free college for everyone. 5x the military budget"
Why not? If people don't listen to the truth and vote instead for the man who tells very nearly EXCLUSIVELY lies then what is there to lose?
One disproportionately effects black voters with a (https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/impa...) ~10% effectiveness
Just because one is working better then the other doesn't mean they are any different in their purpose
Years of zero consequence. Imagine what an egomaniacal, unethical, vengeful, unempathetic, asshole could do with all of that power.
Many you really couldn't possibly sanitize the situation any more. He said an absolutely heinous thing out loud that reflects values I definitely don't want from someone running a "neutral" dissemination platform for secrets
This has a lot of pathways, tech efficiency, slower population growth, more resource acquisition (asteroid mining etc). It's definitely possible in the large scope, but I suspect there will be periods of spiking demand that still cause lots of short term conflicts.
Famines and mass migration are very likely with climate change going the way it is. Over the course of 100 years I suspect the resource problem will alleviate but until then there will be a lot of conflict.
The only real long term trick is creating larger and larger gulfs between the resource demand and availability, buffers that can withstand the smaller scale changes. But, unfortunately, our current dominant systems of power view buffers like that as either weakness or opportunity that are antithetical to progress.
And i do feel like that is a decent analogy for the situation
People don't understand how near impossible it is to deploy successfully in trial, in the US.
Seriously 5/10 people in my friends group have ADHD (some with autism too) and we all have such wildly different symptoms and struggles with it that it took quite some time for us to recognize our shared syndrome lol
Imagine futuretopia with me for a moment; when you are hired at a company they send a very secure cryptographic keygen to your subdermal ID implant. Maybe with 3 different fields for "employee" "division" "role"
When you enter the building, implant comms automatically using "employee" with the mantrap pads acting as a second factor as you type in your yearly revolving 9 digit employee passcode
Same with the workstation when you log in using "division", and maybe when you specifically access certain files "role". They all last a user session length, and can all use the employee 9 digit as primary login
This scenario gives you effortless 2 factor, 3 different times, and the employee only has to put in their simple 9 digit code thrice daily, maybe 6 times account for lunch break.
Does this scenario seem like two factor that's on the way out and causing more problems and inconvenience than it's worth?
Two factor sms where you have to type the code in yourself and sms is insecure? Sure that's dog shit. But we can make a better future instead of disregarding a pretty solid security concept
The relevant one is that success feels good and failure feels bad. However, all of these systems rely on raising or lowering your feelings in response to stimulation. That is inherently short term and works best with very direct feedback and short 'loops'.
Humans are simply terrible at long term success(compared to short term) because it is a process of incentive that lives entirely in the logic part of the mind, with very little animal input. And the people/organizations that reliably achieve long term successes already hijack these short term systems to achieve those successes.
This is just a tool to do that, at the end of the day. Games are designed around that animal system, mega optimized, so it makes sense to use them as a format for a productivity tool.
That's especially important now, because so many large organizations have workers that are completely detached from the final product, making the feedback EVEN WORSE.
It's one of those problems that throws you into a fit of self doubt and paranoia. You question your basic assumptions, your hardware, your colleagues, and God himself before making any headway and it turns out its often someone else's "fault", who programmed some core feature of a library 25 years ago in an obscure way, because they never could have imagined the Frankenstein-esque behemoth their code would be embedded in nearly 3 decades later.
Digestible source: last week tonight: https://youtu.be/_uSZwErdH3I?si=DfHkVDbGegVt06tJ
More detailed source: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/03/30/hellhole
I think the guy is getting fucked over in this unfairly, but let's not pretend he has released information to a reasonable standard.