One "fix" is for the caller to correctly classify those fundamentally impossible tasks and pass them to a subprocess.
Some future "AI" could be a billion benchmark-hacks and a way to tell which one is needed.
291 karma · joined November 2, 2022
Some future "AI" could be a billion benchmark-hacks and a way to tell which one is needed.
Because thousands of users make the same mistake, blame needs to be directed at Windows UX.
MS could fix this easily by 1) moving Run to optional features and 2) removing online features from Start to make performance comparable.
The other "run" interfaces (terminal, conhost, Powershell) are sufficiently menacing to scare away non-devs already.
I'm sure there's a little truth to both, and noise from all kinds of other factors.
Fraud is just the default lifestyle of marketers.
There's always some pointless name change going on.
For L1 fees to actually increase over time, we need increased L1 throughput. Without that, increased demand for transactions causes more batching of transactions (mostly between exchanges).
Given the failure of BCH for pseudo-religious reasons I don't have much hope.
That's not something solved by cryptocurrency in its current form.
Blockchain can't handle external state.
Smart contracts abstract it a bit by having a trusted third party or an automated pricing mechanism, but both are fragile.
In practice it makes more sense if you always assume the intended purpose is to thinly veil constructive dismissal.
Keygen was also easily available.
This one is a classic for MSSQL, most of it is applicable on postgres.
Hundreds of wallets might contain a the same monkey picture (or same hash and IPFS link to nitpick).
What matters is that Opensea says you have the "real" one.
Their database is the real list of who owns what, the blockchain is a distraction.
You can see it in their anti-theft systems. NFTs get hidden and blocked from trading after a police report, even if it's still there on the chain.
That means classic claims like "bitcoin is scarce" or "transactions don't require anyone's permission" or "transactions can't be censored" or "nobody can seize your bitcoin" are generally false in practice.
Even if a person only trades via bags of cash in dark alleyways and never touches exchanges, they're affected by all this "paper" bitcoin.
If they need to touch an exchange at any point, even if holding in a cold wallet 99% of the time, that exchange can still take 100% of their tokens.
It is a serious concern for cryptocurrency that most users don't even get the touted benefits because of reliance on exchanges.
It's p-hacking democracy. If a proposal has 5% chance of passing just resubmit it twenty times under different names with minor variations.
It wastes time that lawmakers could spend on proposals that the public actually want.
They collect package managers like funko pops.
I'm not quite sure about the goal. Maybe some more C# dev kit style rug-pulls where the ecosystem is nominally open-source but MS own the development and distribution so nobody would bother to compete.
They broke the social contract of being a trusted host, that's the biggest change.
E.g. Annexe.txt (that you might assume would be safely opened by a text editor) could actually be Ann\u202Etxt.exe, a dangerous executable.