298 karma · joined December 14, 2020
With this law, the risk is going to be so high that even carefully treading won't be worth it. It will completely put the industry on ice.
Fair is understood in a meritocracy to be with respect to skill level, not with respect to any particular person's moral standard.
Could someone who is more familiar with security comment on this?
But at first I thought this was a serious app to be used for recruiting. I actually thought it was a clever way to screen candidates quickly for their coding ability. I was a little disappointed that it wasn't that.
I initially built this just as a fun landing page for a larger AI related project. I ended up building a 2D interpolator for GAN generated outputs. Since the control was 2D, I figured it would be fun to add a fluid simulator that tracks your mouse. And now it's become a fun interactive toy all on its own.
The way it works is by taking a 3x3 grid of GAN outputs, applying a gaussian kernel for blending that maximizes total variance, interpolating the frames and then finally producing a video file. As you move your mouse, it seeks to various points within the video.
I have started with cats here because all great things on the internet lead back to cats, of course. But this can work with any GAN that can be interpolated. In this case, it is Stylegan2.
There are some easter eggs in here as well - see if you can find them :)
Feedback is definitely appreciated. Thank you for taking a look.
Future regulations with teeth, but don't exist yet, are things like:
- Data portability: I should be able to export my entire Facebook account in full in a standardized format and easily transfer it to any other social network of my choosing.
- Algorithmic control: I should be able to choose which recommendation algorithms are being used on me, or opt out of algorithms entirely.
- Algorithmic transparency: As a consumer, I should be able to see something similar to what Facebook's growth team sees. What specific changes caused people in my cohort to increase their watch time by 2%? Was it better button placement, which I'd be okay with, or was it an increase in conspiracy content, which might not be?
All of these things might be huge overhauls and difficult for the social media companies to deliver, but if you are pushing content in front of billions of people's faces for hours a day you should have an equivalent immense level of responsibility.
During the Victorian era arsenic was known to be poisonous yet "Arsenic Complexion Wafers" were advertised in newspapers claiming that it would remove freckles and pimples. Yet no one in their right mind would argue preventing arsenic from being peddled is an infringement on free speech.
Furthermore, proving deceptive intent is not necessary under false advertising law. The deception of the advertisement is considered alone.
People who are opponents to laws like these on the basis of freedom seem to forget one of the fundamental tenets of it - that your freedom to throw a punch ends where my nose begins.
And there is another axis of high to low feedback in the sense of abstract (happiness) to concrete (heartrate).
I believe you might be conflating these two axes, but you made me think about it and I think it's very interesting to consider.
My first instinct is I want to see index ticker symbols overlaid on top of the sentiment chart to how well they do or don't correlate. Just showing periods of on/off correlation between tickers and sentiment in general would be an interesting visualization. Have you considered this?
Being very convinced of ones ideas, but readily willing to change them in the face of new evidence, is a trait of a person who cares a lot but also has no hidden agenda.