Kinnard

Is it possible that ppl who work at facebook have ethics that merely differ from yours?

Have you checked out arc?

http://arclanguage.org/

Hackernews is written in arc. I also think its interesting the the comment structure is a tree, just like an S-expression:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-expression

Nope, looks like its a sparse field.

Stack as in stack machine:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_machine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack-oriented_programming

Zero Knowledge Proofs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-knowledge_proof

Do you think regulated financial institutions don't cause massive societal harm? Have you seen the big short?

Systems have holes people will go through them

So they don't use unix time?

This could be a problem for ricardian contracts and/or smart contracts

Noisebridge is a spiritual rock for hackers in the Bay Area and around the world. It deserves your support!

Don't forget luck!

Which I think is common in the master-student relationship including when invaluable lessons are being passed on. An effed up reality.

cf Pai Mei in Kill Bill or Sufi marabouts and their talibés in Senegal.

Rate-of-learning: the most valuable startup compensation: https://kyletibbitts.com/rate-of-learning-the-most-valuable-... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13575706

This doesn't account for recessions before the creation of the Federal Reserve.

BitChat: https://bitchat.bitdb.network

What makes this not a social experiment?

This is too easily gamed to suffice as a rationale.

And millennials make babies.

I was asking about timing

Need a helper?

Will you guys also be updating the arc-lang forum?

You may want to gripe on the arc-language forum:

http://arclanguage.org/forum

What are you guys thinking "eventually" might end up being like?

Do you self-identify as a cynic?

"some some" Is a typo?

How would you operationalize this in order to do an analysis on HN's public data?

I meant by people like me :)

It's a good comment. I down voted because I do see the reason for the allergic reaction.

Perhaps the diction could be improved but I think what the piece points out is a dastardly trap as you're just upon grasping (whatever can be grasped of) Gödel's Wonder.

I speak as a layman.

I was actually discussing this today, especially the first fallacious conclusion. With a Ph.D. candidate at Stanford no less . . .

I don’t think Gödel was demonstrating the "limitations" of logic. I think he was demonstrating the limitations of lower logics so that we could wield higher logic. Just as Cantor broke through into the transfinite.

“From the paradise, that Cantor created for us, no-one can expel us.”

I don’t see Gödel’s theorems as expressing the failure of logic, I think the holes(incompleteness) it illuminates are doorways.

Gödel prompted people to explore things like plurivalent logic and fuzzy logic, at least in the “west”.

https://aeon.co/essays/the-logic-of-buddhist-philosophy-goes...

> The first is that Gödel's theorem imposes some some of profound limitation on knowledge, science, mathematics.

?