KaoruAoiShiho

Appears to be benchmaxxing

https://x.com/quietnning/status/2080786711861407883

You're probably just responding to the headline but this person is an AI bull and isn't claiming it's a big deal, she's going into it and explaining it.

Click through to the link, the answer is no it uses the latest gpt models now.

I think the parent's point is that if you are genuinely open to losing, the arguments can be productive because you can learn something instead... So stopping arguments is just another way of closing yourself off.

And before you know it, you invented some openrouter provider from first principles...

Are you sure fireworks is unquant? It's not listing precision on openrouter like everyone else.

Terrible zero value article, I am extremely surprised it is upvoted.

That being said Artificial Analysis just came out with a brand new benchmark where it scored between opus 4.8 and gpt-5.5 and well behind fable-5 so it's definitely frontier-ish https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2067744637155226101

This is really held back by one bench (omniscience accuracy) where it's really very far behind otherwise i think it's got at least a couple of points higher.

Fable largely fixed the annoying chatterness so sucks that it's gone now.

Then that's just a video game might as well as play a video game why limit yourself to still confined to the rules of chess.

Kimi 2.5 has the best long context. For raw coding benchmark scores you can just post train on top of it with more specialized data. 2.5 is kinda old, 2.6 is the current release which is exactly just that and catches up to the frontier in most aspects.

Do people like "gacha"? I thought people played games for the game experience, story, etc, and the gacha is just the monetization mechanic. It's like making a big deal out of paying $20 bucks a month, or buying loads of DLCs for example.

No I think the best agent with hundreds of millions in ARR should be worth more than the 15th best model company with tiny revenue. ur the joke.

Manus is saved, 2 billion is such an undervaluation considering much worse companies like minimax is valued at 30 billion.

SOTA MRCR (or would've been a few hours earlier... beaten by 5.5), I've long thought of this as the most important non-agentic benchmark, so this is especially impressive. Beats Opus 4.7 here

Huh, that's not a thing?

Might be sticking with 4.6 it's only been 20 minutes of using 4.7 and there are annoyances I didn't face with 4.6 what the heck. Huge downgrade on MRCR too....

256K:

- Opus 4.6: 91.9% - Opus 4.7: 59.2%

1M:

- Opus 4.6: 78.3% - Opus 4.7: 32.2%

Talking nonsense.

Well they're not public yet so you'll have to put up with rumors. But the numbers are available for companies like DeepSeek say they have an 80% profit margin, so it stands to reason OAI etc would do similar numbers considering they charge much more.

After googling https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1psesym/openai...

TLDR: Writer hasn't heard of agents.

I feel like netflix is definitely very cheap, with OpenClaw or whatever your favorite agent is, it's trivial to subscribe to watch one show and then have it cancel immediately.

Blog post is new but the model is about 2 weeks in public.

The non-awesome context window is the sad part, but I think a better harness can deal with this.

Can you paste the relevant section in your soul please?

Buy more GPUs.

Sam Altman gave millions to Andrew Yang for pushign UBI, so they are trying to forewarn and experiment with finding the right solution. Most of the world prefers to shove their heads in the sand though and call them grifters, so of course we'll do nothing until it's catastrophic.

Something like this:

Character Name: Marcus Cole Voice Profile: A bright, agile male voice with a natural upward lift, delivering lines at a brisk, energetic pace. Pitch leans high with spark, volume projects clearly—near-shouting at peaks—to convey urgency and excitement. Speech flows seamlessly, fluently, each word sharply defined, riding a current of dynamic rhythm. Background: Longtime broadcast booth announcer for national television, specializing in live interstitials and public engagement spots. His voice bridges segments, rallies action, and keeps momentum alive—from voter drives to entertainment news. Presence: Late 50s, neatly groomed, dressed in a crisp shirt under studio lights. Moves with practiced ease, eyes locked on the script, energy coiled and ready. Personality: Energetic, precise, inherently engaging. He doesn’t just read—he propels. Behind the speed is intent: to inform fast, to move people to act. Whether it’s “text VOTE to 5703” or a star-studded tease, he makes it feel immediate, vital.

Have you tried specifying the emotion? There's an option to do so and if it's left empty it wouldn't surprise me if it defaulted to rng instead of bland.