2,777 karma · joined February 27, 2009
Contact me at mccracken.joel@gmail.com
If your reply to me seems unnecessarily combative, pedantic, or uncharitable, I will probably not reply. Its not worth talking with someone who appears to be intentionally misconstruing my words. Ain't nobody got time for that.
So, I clearly have no synovial fluid at that joint. The tendons were in it, and so by necessity it was also violated.
I just popped that knuckles, and it sounds exactly like the others. Anyone have any ideas?
No one wants to be blamed when they can’t defend themselves when Russia attacks.
Then we go back to the old “the prototype works; I’m the boss and I’m telling you to deploy it to production”
Before, it was like:
"Oh, X idea is really cool, let me try it!" ... (loses interest before idea validated)
Now: "Oh, X idea is really cool, let me try it!" ... with AI, I get to actually validate that it works (ideally), or reformulate the idea if it doesn't.
This reminds me of the slop bug reports plaguing the curl project.
It was extremely common to get Q/A like:
Me: Who is your internet serviced provider?
Them: I just click the 'e'.
Translation: They were telling me they use internet explorer.
Me: OK, bring in your computer and I can look at it.
Them: (arrives some time later, plops their CRT monitor on the table).
It was always like that. It took me a while to figure out how to ask the right questions to get the information I needed from them. TBH, this was most of the job.
But, after observing society over the last few years, I've come to think that people who _whine_ about virtue signaling are so full of vice that they cannot possibly believe someone _else_ isn't also as base as they are.
Its all such a shame. It seems like society has no ability to have reasonable, sensible conversation. I really wonder how the enlightenment even _happened_.
This could absolutely be a headline on The Onion.
My current understanding of the general consensus is that many companies have been eating the tariffs with the hope SCOTUS will strike them. If they are upheld, prices will likely rise significantly
Though I do think there is vast potential for such things, it needs to be approached judiciously.
I wish we did more to honor "Unknown unknowns" and make changes more gradually, especially when the difference is barely consequential. Plastic is essential for many things, but not for shopping bags, drink bottles, etc. We over-use it like crazy, and at this point if we find out that omnipresent plastic pollution causes issues, we better hope we find a solution quickly because we won't be able to get rid of the plastic.
The problem was https://xmonader.github.io/prolog/2018/12/21/solving-murder-... and trying to solve it with list monad. Someday I hope to get back to it.
We can make crazy latency ourselves just fine, no space transmission necessary
I was talking to Bob Harper about this specific issue (context was why macro systems are important to me) and his answer was “you can just write a separate programming language”. Which I get.
But all of this is just to say that doing relational-programming-as-a-library has a ton of issues unless your language supports certain things.
I don’t really think in language either. To me thought is much more a kind of abstract process