What are you using?
300 karma · joined December 8, 2020
What are you using?
I don't know exactly what the option is called but since Android 8 there is at least a toggle there per app. Later versions have lots more settings.
However, most native speakers have an active vocabulary between 15,000 and 35,000 words.
We must be geniuses, lol.The appx is: Approximate size 21.8 MB according to https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9wzdncrfhvn5
Win7 calc.exe had 758KB for i686 and 897KB for amd64.
If you want mail to just work and updates going smoothly it's the solution.
Or what I actually use for ssh on the road: https://github.com/klausw/hackerskeyboard
Google kicked it from their store because it still supports older Androids but it still works just fine on the latest versions. It's on F-Droid.
It would be cool to see this test with a CRT connected to a VGA port (adapters make it slower) and a PS/2 input device.
It's likely his monitor. Would be interesting to see CRT results.
"To investigate, I used a small Teensy microcontroller to measure click-to-photon latency. It acts as a USB HID mouse and is paired with a light sensor pressed against the screen. I flashed it with an existing Open Source LDAT sketch, with slight modifications. The resulting setup can log hundreds of samples to a CSV file, unattended."IP address has no effect on the User Agent block though...
UA being blocked for example:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:140.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/140.0
Did mess with it some more:Allowed:
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; zh-tw) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; cs) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01
406: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0 Opera/12.0
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 14; rv:140.0) Gecko/20110101 Firefox/140.0
Maybe just remove it? 406 browser not supported
for ESR Firefox 140.If I set my UA to "FUCKIT" I can use the site perfectly fine. Why is there a User Agent Filter that disables the whole website? This should be maybe a warning, not a complete block.
Source: I was a kid once, we had no cell phones. Porn on 5.25" floppies was a thing.
That would easily be enforceable by making a "kid mode" enabled and locked down by a parent with a password mandatory on devices. Then you could have something like this:
Adult-Content: true
Age-Threshold: 18
suggested here: https://digitalbiztalk.com/article/a-better-way-the-adult-co...eMediaMark is now Internet Content Rating the stuff I was remembering can be seen here: https://icr.chit.eu/
You can just take that, it's been there for decades.
Asking for a friend ;)
EDIT: Don't. "/s" in case not obvious.
Your Browser Agent string isn't Chrome or Firefox? Enjoy endless Cloudflare captchas or just a 403 error.