Hacker News Reader

JetezLeLoginon Oregon’s Tsunami Risk

Well, everybody loves it when real estate increases in value, and gets turned over at a higher price, with or without first being "improved" by being built on. Notice that tends to ruin it for everyone else though. Wouldn't it be grand if that whole strip of coastal land were just public parks instead of retiree cottages.

"Who will buy a house in a neighborhood too dangerous for a police station?" he asked. "Who will start a business in an area where fire stations are not allowed?"

Preferably no one?

JetezLeLoginon Oregon’s Tsunami Risk

For the curious here's a tsunami inundation/evac map of the Pacific Northwest coast: http://nvs.nanoos.org/TsunamiEvac

JetezLeLoginon Oregon’s Tsunami Risk

Defensively upvoted BeetleB because the comment is literally and factually true and I see nothing disingenuous or partisan about it, nor would I venture into such intent-divining, mind-reading territory. You're correct about the intent of the Republican embargo, but your point is about what would have happened. BeetleB's comment is about what did happen. If we're all champions of rational discussion on HN then surely there's room for that much subtlety, not to mention plain facts. Not enough Democrats supported the bill; they declared it dead; Republicans decided in light of that, they could stop their stonewalling (and in my opinion, dereliction of duty). It's a technicality, and it's technically true.

JetezLeLoginon Dear Agile, I’m Tired of Pretending (2018)

Insisting on the estimate in that situation is basically a special case of the old trope of using something meaningless but easy-to-measure as a proxy for something important but hard-to-measure. It's hard to know how long something will take, and easy to ask someone how long they think it will take (or if it's you, to pull an estimate out of your butt).

JetezLeLoginon Ask HN: Why do new(ish) programming languages eschew OOP features?

The ideal language is flexible enough to be multi-paradigm, i.e. it allows you to use OO or procedural or functional etc. as needed/desired, but doesn't force any one of those on you. It gets back to something Paul Graham said[0]: roughly that having "ulterior motives" is a bad trait in a language, and I would consider "getting dogmatic about the paradigm they want you to use" to fall under that. But Rome wasn't built in a day, keep that in mind too, specifically concerning newer languages. Sometimes something isn't there but it's on the roadmap.

[0] http://www.paulgraham.com/javacover.html

JetezLeLoginon Smartphones and Dematerialization

I'm not real happy with either of the two. They both have connotations that are irrelevant: "ephemeral" tends to mean brief/transitory, while any negation of "material" leans toward either non-existence or "not-mattering."

There's already a 90s-origin term that considers this same phenomenon, in the same context, and addresses it in the way we want it to: virtual. Software on phones "virtualizes" our clocks/cameras/etc. Wired of all publications should remember that one. Actually maybe they're explicitly avoiding it after spending years saying "virtual" seemingly every 3rd or 4th word!

N-gram of "virtual":

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=virtual&year_s...

The line really starts sloping upward in the 90s and peaks in the early 00s.

JetezLeLoginon Schools are using unproven surveillance technology to monitor students

All this - being spied on 100% of the time - ostensibly to prevent something that has about a 1 in 600,000,000 chance of happening to you, ever. Oh but it must be a real and ever-present danger - I saw it on the news!

By that logic we should have facial recognition too, just to make sure JLo doesn't walk in. She's been all over the news for 20 years, so it must be an epidemic.

The critique in this article focuses on technological unreliability without addressing the profound wrongheadedness of the idea in the first place. Perhaps that's been discussed plenty elsewhere, but I for one could stand to have that part of the critique repeated ad infinitum until it sinks in.

JetezLeLoginon System Internals of Windows; OS X; Linux; ARM

Wow, this is pretty awesome, thanks.

JetezLeLoginon One In Five Employees Is Highly Engaged and at Risk of Burnout (2018)

Holy crap, I need to email this link both to my old boss, and to my likely new boss with whom I'm negotiating salary right now!

JetezLeLoginon Is he a record-setting marathon runner, or a cheater?

"I took up running for fun. What I can tell you is that I did not cut. My last few marathons I have had to step off the course, looking for a place to pee. I didn’t know this was against the rules, I was not aware of that. I’ve done this several times. I’ve realized my problem is that I don’t hydrate properly. I have never cut the distance but I have stepped off of the course."

Just analyzing the man's statements for basic "tells" of non-candor and non-forthrightness, like they do in law enforcement:

1) "What I can tell you is..." - That's a distancing, qualifying phrase - we might call it an abstraction layer. It's like there's an AnswerTheQuestion() method that instead of just returning an answer, has to first call the GetAThingToTellThem() method. Hmm interesting. Great separation of concerns if you're a computer program, but totally unnecessary if you're being concise and direct.

2) "What I can tell you is that I did not cut." - It's a non-denial denial. He doesn't actually say he didn't cut. He says he can tell you that he didn't cut. (OK go ahead and tell me then, whenever you're ready.) He can also tell me that he's a purple elephant that farts rainbows.

3) "...I did not cut" - Resorting to a formality by eschewing the contraction - using "did not" vs. "didn't." And I wouldn't make the usual allowance for Latin heritage, because he's a doctor and has been in the US for a long time, plus he uses contractions freely elsewhere (didn't, I've).

4) After starting two sentences with "I've", notice in the last sentence (the second it comes time for another direct denial), it goes back to formal language: "I have."

5) "I didn't know this was against the rules..." Getting defensive, trying to portray himself as a victim being persecuted unjustly (totally outside the normal purview of the usual rules which he thought he knew) and therefore deserving of sympathy. Also subtly attacking the interviewer for asking the question. Aggression is a big tell.

6) Overall does it seem to be just impartially reporting/presenting information or does it seem to be making a case or argument by "dressing up" the facts to favor himself? Notice the overall wordiness of the thing and the volunteering of superfluous information. I do this for fun. I don't hydrate properly (WTF does that mean, you tryin to say you drank too much water dawg?)

None of these on their own would be inherently suspicious, and might have other explanations, but occurring all together like this, they're a billboard telling you "Take a closer look."

Edit: Reply comments are starting to object along the lines that this doesn't prove anything. That is correct. The goal isn't to prove guilt; only evidence proves guilt. The goal is only to direct the course of the investigation. You're only looking for "warmer or colder." Keep going this direction or look somewhere else? That's why I conclude with "Take a closer look" and not "Please convict this person of a crime immediately." It's akin to a polygraph reading - fairly unscientific, generally inadmissible, but valuable in deciding what to do next in the investigation.

JetezLeLoginon Intel lays off hundreds of tech administrators

That's exactly what they did. In the past year or so they've migrated everybody from a custom DBA type arrangement to a self-serve DBaaS system. They've also turned over the keys for people to do their admin stuff in a self-serve way in the on-premises-hosted cloud. You can now spin up an onsite VM very easily and do your thing, without letting the precious-precious flow outside of Intel at any time to e.g. AWS, Azure etc. (Though if what you do is below a certain secrecy level, you can do that too.)

The downside is that for those applications that have tried to stay on the custom model (cough), IT service quality and quantity has gone straight down the shitter. You can submit help tickets and like never hear back. I guess now I know why - it wasn't so much "Thanks for coming, enjoy your stay" as it was "Run for the lifeboats, we're sinking the ship!"