Jabrov

> If so many of them are leveraging AI perhaps the better move is to find ways to align that usage with learning

Should the course be updated to better leverage AI? Sure.

But as a student, if you're explicitly instructed not to use AI for a particular course/assignment and you do it anyway, that's academic dishonesty. No matter how much you disagree with the principle of the thing, you still lied and cheated.

Is this a joke? “Jev-like” properties? People have been using LLMs as classifiers or rankers in a similar way for ages. I feel like we’re losing our minds

A lot of people just read the title and not the article

No, they'd probably have to hack the internal system of the company running them

It might still be useful for classification usecases

My eyes glazed over the AI slop that is this article. What are you even trying to say?

Is there any actual evidence that they did?

I’m so sick and tired of AI slop.

I spend all day at my desk talking to LLMs for work.

Then I come on here to escape a little and see what people are working on, and it’s just more LLM text.

Good for you that you built a game engine or a game or whatever this post was about (my eyes glazed over), but come on. Stop wasting our time.

You need a static IP address for this to work is the downside, and depending on where you live and who your provider it it can be difficult and/or expensive.

Yes: cost, speed, and reliability.

But all of those things are improving at shocking speeds, so I think we’re on a path where code is losing value quickly.

The letter is more about privacy, not freedom.

They're arguing X is a massive privacy risk and should not get any exemptions.

It's not about being pointless, it's just plain wrong.

The median (not average) household income in the US is 80K USD. p25 is 40K. p10 is 20K. They're struggling, sure.

But I wouldn't call that abject poverty.

Who? What did he want?

The codes can trivially be shared in this case

Same

My eyes just glaze over when I see every file being listed and its purpose. Just because you CAN do that with LLMs doesn’t mean you should. What are you really trying to communicate?

Sooo it’s just streaming a game to your browser. What does this have to do with Dwarf Fortress? There’s tons of generic solutions like this that would work the same way for DF as well. It’s giving AI slop.

Transformers are superior

They've lost the plot, especially with the spa. And a billion scans a month is absurd.

Is this some AI hallucination post?

They almost certainly did filter, but there’s always false negatives with this kind of stuff

Holy crap. Had to pick my jaw up off the floor. I hope you get some kind of acknowledgement or bounty for this. Kudos for having the willpower to resist sending a message to millions of people and sparking a global phenomenon!

Have you ever tried that? For me, the lag was the tiniest bit perceptible and was enough to make me sick

A million AI researcher voices at big tech companies suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced

Stop using ollama

It's yet another surface for dependency attacks

Why would there be less gridlock if people were in a driverless car instead of a regular car?

"The (annoying) solution is to package our server up into a connector/plugin and release it for each and every LLM client out there."

Isn't this literally against the entire point of MCP

Hide some of your ballooning AI spend behind your ballooning AWS bill

I think you might have misunderstood the headline and maybe not read the article, because that's not really relevant to what's being announced here

I’m not American, and reminding OP that we’re not all American on this site