208 karma · joined November 14, 2010
https://i.redditmedia.com/E44ciq7vb9r1t9sAzo3giCym74vSloIyK7...
This is Judge posing for a picture with Aryth's alliance leader, The Mittani, at Fanfest.
Every major alliance leader has been to the pubcrawl that CCP puts together, for each fanfest. 99% of attendees pay their own way.
Longinius Spear once quoted Ernest Hemmingway, in a presentation at Eve: Vegas, "There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter."
https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/crime-courts/2017/05/07/bill...
Forcing the narc to snort coke is not a viable means of weeding them out.
2) In places where it is illegal to buy, you have to provide anonymity for the buyers. Looks like you're already making plans to do just that. Good for you. You're now no longer capable of keeping your contractors safe.
---
My advice to you: Commit one crime at a time. Even Uber managed to do that. :P
https://pinkapp.io/ (nsfw)
Edit: Sorry, I should have made that clearer in my previous comment.
> As a consumer, in $my_economic_model, you don't get to opt out of regulation "because you want to".
~"If two libertarians ever find themselves in agreement on a particular issue, they know that one of them has sold out."
Disposal is handled by taking the waste fluids to your favorite parts store.
There may be a bit of overlap with self-driving ICE cars, though. I'm wondering if that would be more difficult to handle.
Either way, I had been looking for this story, ever since people started talking about modern self-driving cars. Don't know how it slipped through.
"unlawful entry" is usually the common denominator.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Minimum_Drinking_Age_...
"The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 (23 U.S.C. § 158) was passed on July 17, 1984 by the United States Congress. It punished every state that allowed persons below 21 years to purchase and publicly possess alcoholic beverages by reducing its annual federal highway apportionment by ten percent."
I am very much not a lawyer... and more importantly, not familiar with european law on the subject.
Here in the U.S. though, it's a defense. But that still wouldn't change the "man about to be sued" bit.